Difference between revisions of "GTS meeting 7 25 16"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
* The cathode is amazingly robust! | * The cathode is amazingly robust! | ||
** [[File:Slide10.jpg]] | ** [[File:Slide10.jpg]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | * By moving a hand-held magnet around the gun chamber, "something changed" and now there is field emission starting at around 230kV. | ||
+ | ** This induced several gun HV trips (on current) while attempting to operate at 300kV. | ||
+ | ** We tried Kr processing at no avail. We are then operating at 225kV. | ||
+ | |||
+ | * The QE scanner is operational! | ||
+ | ** The following scan was taken after doing Kr processing. This is why the QE in the un-damaged area is smaller than 2.5%. | ||
+ | ** [[File:Comparison between QE map and damaged cathode picture.jpg]] |
Revision as of 09:56, 25 July 2016
- 1 mA semi-stable running for nearly 7 hours: [1]
- At 300kV, with anode bias at +1500 V, and
- Better beam focusing and centering in the viewers, rather than on the solenoids.
- We think is the latter that made the greatest contribution to high current beam
- Even so, we still see sudden "photocathode-anode arcing" that reduces the QE on the illuminated area, but only slightly
- By moving a hand-held magnet around the gun chamber, "something changed" and now there is field emission starting at around 230kV.
- This induced several gun HV trips (on current) while attempting to operate at 300kV.
- We tried Kr processing at no avail. We are then operating at 225kV.