Difference between revisions of "GTS meeting 3 14 17"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with " * Measured QE ~ 3.5% with -100 V Gun bias. Was about 0.4% with -1 kV bias. This is to be compared to QE ~ 3.9% in Prep Chamber with -280 V bias before moving the photocathode...") |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | * | + | * What we have learned so far: |
− | + | # With Gun solenoid off, beamlet from the slit on the second viewer is not exactly horizontal - camera may not be aligned? | |
− | + | # The gun solenoid is not centered on the beam. It is significantly off in -45 degree direction (as seen on the viewers). That has to be addressed before we can take good data. | |
− | + | # The gun HV being on or biased would not help the QE scans. It appears that the best way to measure the QE is with the anode biased and the puck grounded with the long manipulator. | |
− | |||
− | |||
− |
Revision as of 15:15, 12 March 2017
- What we have learned so far:
- With Gun solenoid off, beamlet from the slit on the second viewer is not exactly horizontal - camera may not be aligned?
- The gun solenoid is not centered on the beam. It is significantly off in -45 degree direction (as seen on the viewers). That has to be addressed before we can take good data.
- The gun HV being on or biased would not help the QE scans. It appears that the best way to measure the QE is with the anode biased and the puck grounded with the long manipulator.