Difference between revisions of "Apr 3, 2020 Meeting Minutes"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "To be made... Return to Ionization Effects Meetings Go to Meeting Page") |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | ==Emails/attachments sent during the previous week== | |
| + | *None | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Post-meeting notes== | ||
| + | *Josh presented GPT simulations showing 2 "DC" pulses ionizing H2 gas and showed results & analysis techniques (histograms, distributions of electrons/ions hitting beam pipe, etc.) | ||
| + | *Josh will... | ||
| + | **Compare beam potential vs. theory to benchmark SC routine | ||
| + | **Reduce bunch charge & pulse length to match Joe's simulation parameters (from ppt presentation) | ||
| + | **Try importing line charge to simulate beam potential | ||
| + | **Check random number generator in GPT - histograms of electron/ion energies aren't as expected. | ||
| + | **Add endcaps to Rmax routine | ||
| + | **See if GPT has an ~easy way to simulate Earth's B-Field in the simulations | ||
| + | *Cristhian showed a graph of beam size (x/y RMS vs. z) for different (first) solenoid B-field scale factors. Also showed a plot of the longitudinal E-Field vs z (from just the e-beam) both with and without the solenoid on. Might not need to worry about ions after z=0.76m. | ||
| + | *Solenoid settings during LifeSize runs are on the LifeSize spreadsheet under "Signal_Stats" | ||
[[Ionization Effects Meetings | Return to Ionization Effects Meetings]] | [[Ionization Effects Meetings | Return to Ionization Effects Meetings]] | ||
[[Weekly phone call - Apr 3, 2020 | Go to Meeting Page]] | [[Weekly phone call - Apr 3, 2020 | Go to Meeting Page]] | ||
Latest revision as of 12:06, 7 April 2020
Emails/attachments sent during the previous week
- None
Post-meeting notes
- Josh presented GPT simulations showing 2 "DC" pulses ionizing H2 gas and showed results & analysis techniques (histograms, distributions of electrons/ions hitting beam pipe, etc.)
- Josh will...
- Compare beam potential vs. theory to benchmark SC routine
- Reduce bunch charge & pulse length to match Joe's simulation parameters (from ppt presentation)
- Try importing line charge to simulate beam potential
- Check random number generator in GPT - histograms of electron/ion energies aren't as expected.
- Add endcaps to Rmax routine
- See if GPT has an ~easy way to simulate Earth's B-Field in the simulations
- Cristhian showed a graph of beam size (x/y RMS vs. z) for different (first) solenoid B-field scale factors. Also showed a plot of the longitudinal E-Field vs z (from just the e-beam) both with and without the solenoid on. Might not need to worry about ions after z=0.76m.
- Solenoid settings during LifeSize runs are on the LifeSize spreadsheet under "Signal_Stats"