Difference between revisions of "Apr 17, 2020 Meeting Minutes"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "To be made... Return to Ionization Effects Meetings Go to Meeting Page") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | ==Emails/attachments sent during the previous week== | |
| + | *None | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Post-meeting notes== | ||
| + | *Cristhian presented screen data (at the photocathode) overlayed on top of the corresponding QE scan to see whether back-bombarding ions hit the photocathode in the damage region of the QE scan. | ||
| + | *Josh presented GPT ionization simulations that include the E-field of the T-cathode. | ||
| + | *Ricardo (via Cristhian) showed the effect of both the electron current variation and the initial beam position on the RMS beam size. | ||
| + | |||
[[Ionization Effects Meetings | Return to Ionization Effects Meetings]] | [[Ionization Effects Meetings | Return to Ionization Effects Meetings]] | ||
[[Weekly phone call - Apr 17, 2020 | Go to Meeting Page]] | [[Weekly phone call - Apr 17, 2020 | Go to Meeting Page]] | ||
Revision as of 13:51, 22 April 2020
Emails/attachments sent during the previous week
- None
Post-meeting notes
- Cristhian presented screen data (at the photocathode) overlayed on top of the corresponding QE scan to see whether back-bombarding ions hit the photocathode in the damage region of the QE scan.
- Josh presented GPT ionization simulations that include the E-field of the T-cathode.
- Ricardo (via Cristhian) showed the effect of both the electron current variation and the initial beam position on the RMS beam size.