Difference between revisions of "Apr 24, 2020 Meeting Minutes"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
==Post-meeting notes== | ==Post-meeting notes== | ||
| + | *Cristhian presented the effect of current variation and input beam position on the trajectory and size of the electron beam along the beamline. | ||
*Josh will analyze and compare QE scans from 9/25/17-9/28/17 -- will calibrate them and make difference plots to quantify the QE degradation. Afterwards, we can use the QE scans to make an initial particle distribution and create a simulation to reproduce the QE damage. | *Josh will analyze and compare QE scans from 9/25/17-9/28/17 -- will calibrate them and make difference plots to quantify the QE degradation. Afterwards, we can use the QE scans to make an initial particle distribution and create a simulation to reproduce the QE damage. | ||
*Need to make a custom element for secondary electron yield (SEY) and importing vacuum data. This can take 5 minutes to 5 days. | *Need to make a custom element for secondary electron yield (SEY) and importing vacuum data. This can take 5 minutes to 5 days. | ||
Latest revision as of 10:13, 7 May 2020
Emails/attachments sent during the previous week
- None
Post-meeting notes
- Cristhian presented the effect of current variation and input beam position on the trajectory and size of the electron beam along the beamline.
- Josh will analyze and compare QE scans from 9/25/17-9/28/17 -- will calibrate them and make difference plots to quantify the QE degradation. Afterwards, we can use the QE scans to make an initial particle distribution and create a simulation to reproduce the QE damage.
- Need to make a custom element for secondary electron yield (SEY) and importing vacuum data. This can take 5 minutes to 5 days.