Difference between revisions of "Thesis outline"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
==Experiments and numerical simulations of the space charge dominated magnetized beam== | ==Experiments and numerical simulations of the space charge dominated magnetized beam== | ||
− | ===''Experimental | + | ===''Experimental method''=== |
**''Pulse energy vs extracted charge-for different magnetizations'' | **''Pulse energy vs extracted charge-for different magnetizations'' | ||
**''Space charge current limitation dependence on gun high voltage-for different magnetizations'' | **''Space charge current limitation dependence on gun high voltage-for different magnetizations'' |
Revision as of 00:40, 29 May 2020
Introduction
- Magnetized electron beam
- Applications of the magnetized electron beam
- Magnetized electron cooling
- Jefferson Lab magnetized electron source for the JLEIC cooler
Generation of the magnetized electron beam
- Experimental setup (DC HV gun, photocathode, cathode solenoid, RF laser, focusing solenoids, etc.)
- Beam diagnostics
Beam dynamics
- Beam matrix
- Phase space
- Emittance (thermal, phase space, geometric)
- Effective(drift) emittance (emittance of the magnetized beam)
- Measuring the beam emittance
Space charge effect
- Space charge effect in the magnetized beam
Simulations on the magnetized electron beam
ASTRA
- Initial particle distribution
- Field maps (3D E field map, 2D B field map)
- Space charge calculation mechanism
- Emittance
GPT
- Initial particle distribution (Laser*QE image processing)
- Field maps (3D E field map, 2D B field map)
- Space charge calculation mechanism
- Emittance
Post-processing (MATLAB)
Characterization of the magnetized beam
Experimental method
- Beam size vs solenoid I
- Rotation angle vs solenoid I
- Emittance vs solenoid I - two different laser sizes
- Emittance vs laser spot sizes - max solenoid current
ASTRA/GPT simulations (Simulation of all the above variations)
- Conclusions (comparisons -measurements vs simulations, mismatch oscillations, negative rotation angles, etc.)
Experiments and numerical simulations of the space charge dominated magnetized beam
Experimental method
- Pulse energy vs extracted charge-for different magnetizations
- Space charge current limitation dependence on gun high voltage-for different magnetizations
- Space charge current limitation dependence on pulse width-for different magnetizations
- Space charge current limitation dependence on laser spot size-for different magnetizations
GPT simulations
- Conclusions (Comparison-measurements and simulations)
Redesigning and performance of the photogun
- Existing electrostatic design
- Modified electrostatic design
- Polishing and gun assembly
- High voltage conditioning