Difference between revisions of "July 31, 2020 Meeting Minutes"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Post-meeting notes== | ==Post-meeting notes== | ||
| − | * | + | *Ricardo presented updated results of secondary electron trajectories (after SEY) with expanded steering magnet field map - previously the field map did not cover the entire beam pipe (this was fine for the focused primary electron beam, but not for ions and secondary electrons) |
| + | *Carlos showed the positions of radiation monitors around the CEBAF (?) gun | ||
| + | *Link to Google Doc is now on this meeting page (and will be on all future meeting pages). | ||
| + | **Josh will upload a QE difference plot to the outline. Cristhian uploaded a QE plot from June 2017 with the ion damage distribution overlayed. The distribution overlaps where the apparent QE damage is. | ||
| + | *Josh showed preliminary simulations for the GPT/IBSimu benchmarking test. Will have a full presentation next week. | ||
| + | **Two simulations used a constant H2 density of 10^17 and two used Marcy's H2 density profile for CEBAF from Molflow. | ||
| + | **Will try a higher density to increase the # of ions produced in the simulation - this will hopefully show that ion transverse distribution matches the Gaussian transverse distribution of the primary electrons. | ||
| + | **Also need to filter the results by particle type (i.e. primary electrons, secondary electrons, SEY, ions) | ||
| + | **Need to use space charge - maybe should get potential from primary electron beam and use that? Not sure if it would be faster to do that... | ||
Latest revision as of 10:42, 3 August 2020
Post-meeting notes
- Ricardo presented updated results of secondary electron trajectories (after SEY) with expanded steering magnet field map - previously the field map did not cover the entire beam pipe (this was fine for the focused primary electron beam, but not for ions and secondary electrons)
- Carlos showed the positions of radiation monitors around the CEBAF (?) gun
- Link to Google Doc is now on this meeting page (and will be on all future meeting pages).
- Josh will upload a QE difference plot to the outline. Cristhian uploaded a QE plot from June 2017 with the ion damage distribution overlayed. The distribution overlaps where the apparent QE damage is.
- Josh showed preliminary simulations for the GPT/IBSimu benchmarking test. Will have a full presentation next week.
- Two simulations used a constant H2 density of 10^17 and two used Marcy's H2 density profile for CEBAF from Molflow.
- Will try a higher density to increase the # of ions produced in the simulation - this will hopefully show that ion transverse distribution matches the Gaussian transverse distribution of the primary electrons.
- Also need to filter the results by particle type (i.e. primary electrons, secondary electrons, SEY, ions)
- Need to use space charge - maybe should get potential from primary electron beam and use that? Not sure if it would be faster to do that...