Difference between revisions of "PPB - Aug 4, 2021"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "== Meeting Info == We will meet on Wed ('''UAS 9am''', JLab 11am, IJCLab 5pm) Bluejeans: https://bluejeans.com/405130883/4307 Code to start the meeting 4307 ==Aug 4 Agenda...") |
|||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
** Arguments for a cold start tune-up of CEBAF with low current (duty factor typ. e- 10 uA pulse @ 60 Hz) | ** Arguments for a cold start tune-up of CEBAF with low current (duty factor typ. e- 10 uA pulse @ 60 Hz) | ||
** Arguments for realistic multi-pass acceptance | ** Arguments for realistic multi-pass acceptance | ||
| + | |||
| + | * How do we coordinate our efforts? | ||
==Jul 28th Agenda == | ==Jul 28th Agenda == | ||
Revision as of 10:18, 4 August 2021
Meeting Info
We will meet on Wed (UAS 9am, JLab 11am, IJCLab 5pm) Bluejeans: https://bluejeans.com/405130883/4307 Code to start the meeting 4307
Aug 4 Agenda
- Mark's presentation
- schematic of layout
- fraction of e+/e- beam
- include e- (need Geant4 + standard GPT)
- Why PAC proposals might fail?
- Arguments that reversing CEBAF dipole polarities is problematic or costly
- Arguments for a cold start tune-up of CEBAF with low current (duty factor typ. e- 10 uA pulse @ 60 Hz)
- Arguments for realistic multi-pass acceptance
- How do we coordinate our efforts?
Jul 28th Agenda
- Positron parameter tables:
- Discussion
Meeting Notes
- Small meeting with Eric, Riad, Ryan and Mark
- Bunch length needs to be confirmed, north linac fractional energy spread acceptance needs to be checked, emittance is a concern
- possibility of FFA use given the wide energy/momentum spread
- presentation with table values explained and simulations is being worked on