Difference between revisions of "PPB - Aug 11, 2021"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
* Include quads after collimator in simulation - Mark | * Include quads after collimator in simulation - Mark | ||
* Preliminary optimization for simulation with e-/e+ -Mark | * Preliminary optimization for simulation with e-/e+ -Mark | ||
| + | *Address GPT normalization with Bas -Mark | ||
== Meeting Notes & Objectives Status == | == Meeting Notes & Objectives Status == | ||
| − | * | + | *3rd dipole straight to dump. |
*Target geometry curve, thickness, ect.. | *Target geometry curve, thickness, ect.. | ||
| − | * | + | *Beam spot size, target rotation averages the target geometry, 100-200 um huge energy deposition |
| − | * | + | *Quad after collimator |
| − | * | + | *CW long bunch issues. Chopper cavity? |
| + | *Consideration for achromatic conditions. Do we want it to be achromatic and where? | ||
Latest revision as of 11:47, 11 August 2021
Meeting Info
We will meet on Wed (UAS 9am, JLab 11am, IJCLab 5pm) Bluejeans: https://bluejeans.com/405130883/4307 Code to start the meeting 4307
Aug 11 Agenda
- Round table updates
- Mark's presentation media:GPT-S_8112021.pptx
- schematic of layout
- fraction of e+/e- beam
- include e-
Weekly Objective(s)
- e+/e- Geant4 output and comparison -Sami & Mark
- connect with D. Douglas for undulator emittance control-Ryan
- Include quads after collimator in simulation - Mark
- Preliminary optimization for simulation with e-/e+ -Mark
- Address GPT normalization with Bas -Mark
Meeting Notes & Objectives Status
- 3rd dipole straight to dump.
- Target geometry curve, thickness, ect..
- Beam spot size, target rotation averages the target geometry, 100-200 um huge energy deposition
- Quad after collimator
- CW long bunch issues. Chopper cavity?
- Consideration for achromatic conditions. Do we want it to be achromatic and where?