Difference between revisions of "GPT/IBSimu Benchmarking Checklist"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
*Ion production rate benchmarked | *Ion production rate benchmarked | ||
*Using Maxwellian distribution for ion energies | *Using Maxwellian distribution for ion energies | ||
| − | * | + | *GPT writeremove custom element: outputs data for particles that leave the simulation - can be plotted using Mathematica to see where electrons/ions hit the beampipe, e.g. |
| + | |||
==In Progress== | ==In Progress== | ||
| + | *Space charge routine benchmarked against analytical theory for GPT simulations (works specifically for spacecharge3D routine) | ||
*DC and bunched e-beam simulations | *DC and bunched e-beam simulations | ||
| + | |||
| + | *Benchmarking secondary electron production | ||
==To Be Done== | ==To Be Done== | ||
| − | |||
*Create (simple) simulation for benchmarking using everything (ionization, gun E-field, real B-field values, vacuum conditions, same initial distribution, etc.) | *Create (simple) simulation for benchmarking using everything (ionization, gun E-field, real B-field values, vacuum conditions, same initial distribution, etc.) | ||
*For GPT: | *For GPT: | ||
Latest revision as of 14:54, 22 April 2020
Checklist for GPT/IBSimu simulations and benchmarking ionization routine
Done
- Centering electron bunch through 1.5m
- Ion production rate benchmarked
- Using Maxwellian distribution for ion energies
- GPT writeremove custom element: outputs data for particles that leave the simulation - can be plotted using Mathematica to see where electrons/ions hit the beampipe, e.g.
In Progress
- Space charge routine benchmarked against analytical theory for GPT simulations (works specifically for spacecharge3D routine)
- DC and bunched e-beam simulations
- Benchmarking secondary electron production
To Be Done
- Create (simple) simulation for benchmarking using everything (ionization, gun E-field, real B-field values, vacuum conditions, same initial distribution, etc.)
- For GPT:
- Use local vacuum data in ionization routine (instead of assuming constant gas density)
- Derive approximation for SEDCS for gas species other than H2 and He