Difference between revisions of "Kerr - June 27, 2016"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | [[file:pickoffanalysis.jpeg|thumb|center|upright= | + | [[file:pickoffanalysis.jpeg|thumb|center|upright=4| ]] |
| + | |||
| + | We can say within this data the pick-off of the 8% of light from the green light laser indicates there is no major effect in the recorded values of power post-analyzer. Even though the power may dwindle or slightly increase, it is negligible. | ||
| + | |||
| + | In fact, even as the pick-off reading decreases in the +B data set we see an increase in signal power of the Kerr power meter so either the Kerr effect is increasing the light even more than reported or the pick-off data is negligibly affecting the readings. In this case the latter seems more suitable. | ||
| + | |||
| + | In [[Kerr - June 24, 2016]] we see the rotations correlating to power readings and from these data points, I believe we can say we are seeing the Kerr effect in action. | ||
Latest revision as of 09:25, 27 June 2016
We can say within this data the pick-off of the 8% of light from the green light laser indicates there is no major effect in the recorded values of power post-analyzer. Even though the power may dwindle or slightly increase, it is negligible.
In fact, even as the pick-off reading decreases in the +B data set we see an increase in signal power of the Kerr power meter so either the Kerr effect is increasing the light even more than reported or the pick-off data is negligibly affecting the readings. In this case the latter seems more suitable.
In Kerr - June 24, 2016 we see the rotations correlating to power readings and from these data points, I believe we can say we are seeing the Kerr effect in action.