Difference between revisions of "Wednesday February 12, 2014"

From Ciswikidb
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 12: Line 12:
  
 
3- January 12, 2014: achieved p=9.1 MeV/c or K.E.=8.6 MeV for one hour. Still, suffered from trips due to wave guide vacuum faults; may improve with more processing.
 
3- January 12, 2014: achieved p=9.1 MeV/c or K.E.=8.6 MeV for one hour. Still, suffered from trips due to wave guide vacuum faults; may improve with more processing.
 +
 +
4- Issues raised during Accelerator Seminar on Jan 23, 2014:
 +
- To better control bubble chamber deadtime, can we stop the beam when the bubble chamber is not ready for next-event? That is,
 +
beam is on only when chamber is in superheat.
 +
- Is there a nuclear resonance that would help us with the energy measurement?
 +
- Can we present a theoretical calculation that shows the impact of JLab projected data on the the knowledge of S(300)?

Revision as of 17:13, 23 January 2014

We will meet in TL 2236 on Wednesday February 12 at 3:00 pm EST.

For those calling in we'll use the ReadyTalk audio conference system.

1. Dial Toll-Free Number: 866-740-1260 (U.S. & Canada)
2. Enter 7-digit access code 4402297, followed by “#”

Agenda:

1- New "5 MeV" Dipole update and shielding of Earth's magnetic field

2- Bubble Chamber progress at Argonne

3- January 12, 2014: achieved p=9.1 MeV/c or K.E.=8.6 MeV for one hour. Still, suffered from trips due to wave guide vacuum faults; may improve with more processing.

4- Issues raised during Accelerator Seminar on Jan 23, 2014:

- To better control bubble chamber deadtime, can we stop the beam when the bubble chamber is not ready for next-event? That is,
beam is on only when chamber is in superheat.
- Is there a nuclear resonance that would help us with the energy measurement?
- Can we present a theoretical calculation that shows the impact of JLab projected data on the the knowledge of S(300)?