Difference between revisions of "Wednesday February 12, 2014"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
3- January 12, 2014: achieved p=9.1 MeV/c or K.E.=8.6 MeV for one hour. Still, suffered from trips due to wave guide vacuum faults; may improve with more processing. | 3- January 12, 2014: achieved p=9.1 MeV/c or K.E.=8.6 MeV for one hour. Still, suffered from trips due to wave guide vacuum faults; may improve with more processing. | ||
| + | |||
| + | 4- Issues raised during Accelerator Seminar on Jan 23, 2014: | ||
| + | - To better control bubble chamber deadtime, can we stop the beam when the bubble chamber is not ready for next-event? That is, | ||
| + | beam is on only when chamber is in superheat. | ||
| + | - Is there a nuclear resonance that would help us with the energy measurement? | ||
| + | - Can we present a theoretical calculation that shows the impact of JLab projected data on the the knowledge of S(300)? | ||
Revision as of 17:13, 23 January 2014
We will meet in TL 2236 on Wednesday February 12 at 3:00 pm EST.
For those calling in we'll use the ReadyTalk audio conference system.
1. Dial Toll-Free Number: 866-740-1260 (U.S. & Canada) 2. Enter 7-digit access code 4402297, followed by “#”
Agenda:
1- New "5 MeV" Dipole update and shielding of Earth's magnetic field
2- Bubble Chamber progress at Argonne
3- January 12, 2014: achieved p=9.1 MeV/c or K.E.=8.6 MeV for one hour. Still, suffered from trips due to wave guide vacuum faults; may improve with more processing.
4- Issues raised during Accelerator Seminar on Jan 23, 2014:
- To better control bubble chamber deadtime, can we stop the beam when the bubble chamber is not ready for next-event? That is, beam is on only when chamber is in superheat. - Is there a nuclear resonance that would help us with the energy measurement? - Can we present a theoretical calculation that shows the impact of JLab projected data on the the knowledge of S(300)?