Difference between revisions of "GPT/IBSimu Benchmarking Checklist"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
*Centering electron bunch through 1.5m | *Centering electron bunch through 1.5m | ||
*Ion production rate benchmarked | *Ion production rate benchmarked | ||
+ | *Using Maxwellian distribution for ion energies | ||
+ | *Space charge routine benchmarked for GPT simulations (works specifically for spacecharge3D routine) | ||
==In Progress== | ==In Progress== | ||
*DC and bunched e-beam simulations | *DC and bunched e-beam simulations | ||
− | |||
==To Be Done== | ==To Be Done== | ||
Line 18: | Line 19: | ||
**Use local vacuum data in ionization routine (instead of assuming constant gas density) | **Use local vacuum data in ionization routine (instead of assuming constant gas density) | ||
**Derive approximation for SEDCS for gas species other than H2 and He | **Derive approximation for SEDCS for gas species other than H2 and He | ||
− | |||
Revision as of 10:59, 10 April 2020
Checklist for GPT/IBSimu simulations and benchmarking ionization routine
Done
- Centering electron bunch through 1.5m
- Ion production rate benchmarked
- Using Maxwellian distribution for ion energies
- Space charge routine benchmarked for GPT simulations (works specifically for spacecharge3D routine)
In Progress
- DC and bunched e-beam simulations
To Be Done
- Benchmarking secondary electron production
- Create (simple) simulation for benchmarking using everything (ionization, gun E-field, real B-field values, vacuum conditions, same initial distribution, etc.)
- For GPT:
- Use local vacuum data in ionization routine (instead of assuming constant gas density)
- Derive approximation for SEDCS for gas species other than H2 and He