Beamline, Radiator and Dump

Songsheet and Nomenclature

• Design, installation and released mechanical drawings (dipole + beam line) are here \group\bubble\grames
• Songsheet and nomenclature media:ACC2008000-1100.pdf

6 mm Cu Radiator/Dump

• Drawing: media:JL0015733_rad_dump.pdf
• Thermal Analysis: media:ThermalAna_IDL5D01.pdf
• LCW flow to radiator/dump was measured with:

1. A flow-meter and was found to be 0.9 GPM.
2. A bucket and was found to be 2.0 GPM.

Documentation

• Injector Quick Reference media:injector_quick_reference.pdf

Model

• Elegant (Tennet - December 2013): media:BubbleChamber.ele.txt media:BubbleChamber.lte.txt

Drawings

• The electron beam hitting the radiator will be roughly 0.2 mm diameter. We will allow for 5 mm diameter sweet spot. Using beam position monitors we will know the beam position on the radiator to about 1 mm.

• This 5 mm diameter and a 10 mm diameter in the center of the bubble chamber will define a cone. This way we can determine the size of the holes in the collimator. This cone extend all the way to the photon dump.

• The table where the radiator and collimator sit will be made of Al and the frame that hold the collimator will be made of Al, too.

---

---

---

---

• Cu Radiator: media:Bubble_Cu_Radiator.pdf
• Cu Collimator: media:Bubble_Cu_Collimator.pdf
• Al Photon Dump: media:Al_Photon_Dump.pdf

• Questions:

1. Is the assumption about the cone fine. Do want the 10 mm diameter be at the center of the bubble chamber or at the end of the chamber entrance collimator.
2. Is the 5mm diameter what we want to use?
3. Is the size of the photon dump reasonable? Do we need the hole in the photon dump or we can be fine with just a block of Al. Does this whole service any purpose? I thought of it to try to contain any back scattered electrons. Can Argonne make the photon dump?