Difference between revisions of "March 3, 2020 - Modeling"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
;Agenda | ;Agenda | ||
− | + | ;GPT simulations | |
− | + | ||
− | + | ;Elegant simulations | |
− | + | ||
+ | ;FG magnet spacing | ||
+ | /group/inj_group/Field_Maps/Solenoids/FG | ||
+ | |||
+ | ;Injector alignment | ||
From: C. Curtis => I have included the e-mail thread where the offsets were discussed. These are 1.2mm in X and 1.5mm in Z. The discontinuity occurs between the QJ0L02 and QJ0L03 girders. Since we will need to re-align the new components upstream of the Chopper anyway, I would propose re-aligning the remaining elements upstream of QJ0L03 such that they are compatible with the rest of the accelerator. | From: C. Curtis => I have included the e-mail thread where the offsets were discussed. These are 1.2mm in X and 1.5mm in Z. The discontinuity occurs between the QJ0L02 and QJ0L03 girders. Since we will need to re-align the new components upstream of the Chopper anyway, I would propose re-aligning the remaining elements upstream of QJ0L03 such that they are compatible with the rest of the accelerator. | ||
Chris | Chris | ||
− | + | ||
+ | ;Any other status updates |
Revision as of 14:08, 3 March 2020
- Agenda
- GPT simulations
- Elegant simulations
- FG magnet spacing
/group/inj_group/Field_Maps/Solenoids/FG
- Injector alignment
From: C. Curtis => I have included the e-mail thread where the offsets were discussed. These are 1.2mm in X and 1.5mm in Z. The discontinuity occurs between the QJ0L02 and QJ0L03 girders. Since we will need to re-align the new components upstream of the Chopper anyway, I would propose re-aligning the remaining elements upstream of QJ0L03 such that they are compatible with the rest of the accelerator.
Chris
- Any other status updates