Difference between revisions of "March 3, 2020 - Modeling"

From Ciswikidb
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
;Agenda
 
;Agenda
: GPT simulations
+
;GPT simulations
: Elegant simulations
+
 
: FG magnet spacing
+
;Elegant simulations
: Injector alignment
+
 
 +
;FG magnet spacing
 +
/group/inj_group/Field_Maps/Solenoids/FG
 +
 
 +
;Injector alignment
 
  From: C. Curtis => I have included the e-mail thread where the offsets were discussed. These are 1.2mm in X and 1.5mm in Z. The discontinuity occurs between the QJ0L02 and QJ0L03 girders. Since we will need to re-align the new components upstream of the Chopper anyway, I would propose re-aligning the remaining elements upstream of QJ0L03 such that they are compatible with the rest of the accelerator.
 
  From: C. Curtis => I have included the e-mail thread where the offsets were discussed. These are 1.2mm in X and 1.5mm in Z. The discontinuity occurs between the QJ0L02 and QJ0L03 girders. Since we will need to re-align the new components upstream of the Chopper anyway, I would propose re-aligning the remaining elements upstream of QJ0L03 such that they are compatible with the rest of the accelerator.
 
Chris
 
Chris
: Any other status updates
+
 
 +
;Any other status updates

Revision as of 14:08, 3 March 2020

Agenda
GPT simulations
Elegant simulations
FG magnet spacing
/group/inj_group/Field_Maps/Solenoids/FG
Injector alignment
From: C. Curtis => I have included the e-mail thread where the offsets were discussed. These are 1.2mm in X and 1.5mm in Z. The discontinuity occurs between the QJ0L02 and QJ0L03 girders. Since we will need to re-align the new components upstream of the Chopper anyway, I would propose re-aligning the remaining elements upstream of QJ0L03 such that they are compatible with the rest of the accelerator.

Chris

Any other status updates