Difference between revisions of "Jan 24 2024"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
* Max will take the lead to develop the table of parameters with uncertainties which will be used in the simulations (GPT/CST), these will be used to develop allowable tolerances in fabrication/assembly so we can with high likelihood end up within Alicia's acceptance bands, | * Max will take the lead to develop the table of parameters with uncertainties which will be used in the simulations (GPT/CST), these will be used to develop allowable tolerances in fabrication/assembly so we can with high likelihood end up within Alicia's acceptance bands, | ||
− | == | + | == Alicia == |
− | + | == Max and Gabriel == | |
− | + | ||
− | + | * Resolved discrepancy related to different definition of hole diameter: now we consistently use the dimensions from the T-cathode drawing | |
− | + | * Correct cathode position for field map export/import relative to particle start coordinates is important; this changes with cathode recess | |
− | + | * CST field maps tend to be unphysical close to cathode if export boundaries do not align with mesh cells, causing sensitivity to step size in exported file | |
− | * Carlos | + | ** The correct strategy is to start the field map exactly at the photocathode surface. Choose subvolume end point to be start point + multiple of step size to avoid confusing the exporter. In some cases, we need more decimal places than displayed by the idiotic point-picking text box; use trick to get the accurate number, e.g., start defining a cylinder from the picked point and get number from dialog box. |
− | + | ** Then and only then, the step size makes no difference, 0.5 mm is enough. | |
− | + | ||
− | + | * Comparison R28, 0.18 mm recess, hole ID per drawing | |
− | + | ** CST: 73/53 cm, Poisson: 46 cm, measured at CEBAF 180 kV: 42/37 cm, measured at UITF 200 kV: 27/25 cm | |
− | + | ** difference simulation/reality may be related to recess and/or hole diameter | |
+ | |||
+ | * Comparison R30-4, 0.18 mm recess, hole ID same as R28, 15° cone, cone/sphere junction same as R30-3 | ||
+ | ** Symmetric CST model (Neg stuff and HV stalk + guard ring deleted) gives almost the same field map as Poisson, Ez within 0.5 % everywhere | ||
+ | *** CST: 82 cm, Poisson: 72 cm | ||
+ | *** Focal length in GPT is still 10% different, not sure why yet... | ||
+ | ** Complete CST model | ||
+ | *** CST: 92/56 cm, Poisson: 72 cm | ||
+ | *** Too little focusing. Recommend slight increase in Pierce angle to better match R28 results; likely involves a compromise due to stronger astigmatism | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Carlos == | ||
+ | |||
+ | * The 25 deg Pierce cathode front end piece from the GTS spherical electrode gun (R30-1, Yan's thesis) was measured by SRF's Coordinate-Measurement Machine (CMM). | ||
+ | * Findings: | ||
+ | ** Pierce angle design: 25 deg. Measured: 24.4 deg. | ||
+ | ** Cathode hole diameter to extrapolation of conical edge: Design: 0.432 inches = 10.97 mm. Measured: 0.467 in = 11.86 mm | ||
+ | ** Drawing and CMM findings can be found in the SharePoint folder [https://jeffersonlab.sharepoint.com/:f:/s/CIS/Eue6Nk9NNoRCqQpp4LhuaU4BdFAopufFt7xX36aZFbuETA?e=1bTSJp here] | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | == Table of parameters (tentative) == | ||
+ | {| class="wikitable" style="margin:auto" | ||
+ | ! Parameter !! Unit !! Nominal value !! Fabrication uncertainty !! Simulation band !! Comments | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Hole inner radius || mm || 6.4135 || +/- 0.3? || +/- 0.3 || to edge of actual metal, as measured with caliper | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Pierce angle || ° || 15 || ? || +/- 2 || likely need to increase | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Cone/sphere junction angle || ° || 62 || ? || 30 -- 62 || to be decided based on field-emission concerns | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Cathode recess || mm || 0.188 || 0.05 || 0.1 || from Keith's drawing; error may be larger for old pucks | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Laser spot size (RMS) || mm || 0.5 || 0.1 || 0.2 | ||
+ | |} | ||
[https://wiki.jlab.org/ciswiki/index.php/200_kV_Polarized_Gun Return to 200 kV Gun page] | [https://wiki.jlab.org/ciswiki/index.php/200_kV_Polarized_Gun Return to 200 kV Gun page] |
Revision as of 15:02, 23 January 2024
Action items from last time
- Gabriel will work w/ ME to confirm the R28 cathode insert hole size/shape, i.e. post the shop print,
- Gabriel/Max will decide on prototypical R30-4 parameters like that of the R28 cathode insert (hole, cone shape, lip shape) at CEBAF, then Gabriel will generate the corresponding CST model, and Alicia will include this in her comparison with (R28 & R30 @ z=19cm optics match-point),
- Gabriel will look at testing a cylindrically symmetric CST model against Max's POISSON model to confirm differences, intending to confirm that the differences are just 2-D vs. 3-D, nothing else,
- Alicia will continue to develop bands of acceptance parameters at Z=19cm, where parameters refers to the beam/optics parameters acceptable/typical for the CEBAF injector (implicitly meaning up to max current),
- Max and Alicia will continue to develop and experimental match-point for the purpose of comparison between measurement and model; as mentioned above a simulation match-point at Z=19cm has already been found in a drift free region after the gun,
- Max will provide some sets of optics optimized cathode parameters (hole=fixed, cone shape, lip shape) to Gabriel, so he may generate a detailed CST model to explore max E-field strengths at surfaces/triple-points,
- Max will take the lead to develop the table of parameters with uncertainties which will be used in the simulations (GPT/CST), these will be used to develop allowable tolerances in fabrication/assembly so we can with high likelihood end up within Alicia's acceptance bands,
Alicia
Max and Gabriel
- Resolved discrepancy related to different definition of hole diameter: now we consistently use the dimensions from the T-cathode drawing
- Correct cathode position for field map export/import relative to particle start coordinates is important; this changes with cathode recess
- CST field maps tend to be unphysical close to cathode if export boundaries do not align with mesh cells, causing sensitivity to step size in exported file
- The correct strategy is to start the field map exactly at the photocathode surface. Choose subvolume end point to be start point + multiple of step size to avoid confusing the exporter. In some cases, we need more decimal places than displayed by the idiotic point-picking text box; use trick to get the accurate number, e.g., start defining a cylinder from the picked point and get number from dialog box.
- Then and only then, the step size makes no difference, 0.5 mm is enough.
- Comparison R28, 0.18 mm recess, hole ID per drawing
- CST: 73/53 cm, Poisson: 46 cm, measured at CEBAF 180 kV: 42/37 cm, measured at UITF 200 kV: 27/25 cm
- difference simulation/reality may be related to recess and/or hole diameter
- Comparison R30-4, 0.18 mm recess, hole ID same as R28, 15° cone, cone/sphere junction same as R30-3
- Symmetric CST model (Neg stuff and HV stalk + guard ring deleted) gives almost the same field map as Poisson, Ez within 0.5 % everywhere
- CST: 82 cm, Poisson: 72 cm
- Focal length in GPT is still 10% different, not sure why yet...
- Complete CST model
- CST: 92/56 cm, Poisson: 72 cm
- Too little focusing. Recommend slight increase in Pierce angle to better match R28 results; likely involves a compromise due to stronger astigmatism
- Symmetric CST model (Neg stuff and HV stalk + guard ring deleted) gives almost the same field map as Poisson, Ez within 0.5 % everywhere
Carlos
- The 25 deg Pierce cathode front end piece from the GTS spherical electrode gun (R30-1, Yan's thesis) was measured by SRF's Coordinate-Measurement Machine (CMM).
- Findings:
- Pierce angle design: 25 deg. Measured: 24.4 deg.
- Cathode hole diameter to extrapolation of conical edge: Design: 0.432 inches = 10.97 mm. Measured: 0.467 in = 11.86 mm
- Drawing and CMM findings can be found in the SharePoint folder here
Table of parameters (tentative)
Parameter | Unit | Nominal value | Fabrication uncertainty | Simulation band | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hole inner radius | mm | 6.4135 | +/- 0.3? | +/- 0.3 | to edge of actual metal, as measured with caliper |
Pierce angle | ° | 15 | ? | +/- 2 | likely need to increase |
Cone/sphere junction angle | ° | 62 | ? | 30 -- 62 | to be decided based on field-emission concerns |
Cathode recess | mm | 0.188 | 0.05 | 0.1 | from Keith's drawing; error may be larger for old pucks |
Laser spot size (RMS) | mm | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.2 |