02/16/16 Meeting Analysis Follow-Up

Removing Thickest Foils

Fits of Run II data, "dilution"-subtracted, energy cut from -0.5 to +2 sigma, with thickest foils removed in sequence. Thickness data is from 1/22/16 and does not reflect newest FESEM thickness uncertainties presented 2/16/16. They, however, should not affect the fits dramatically.

Pade forms (0,1), red, former best fit; (2,0), blue, and (1,1), green are included. Note that from 2/16/16 presentation by Marty, the simulation-motivated best fit is the Pade (1,1), green on the plots, of the form

A(t) = (A₀ + b * t) / (1 + c * t)

all foils

no 1000 nm

no 1000 and 870 nm

no 1000, 870, 750 nm

no 1000, 870, 750, 625 nm

no 1000, 870, 750, 625 and 500 nm

Half-Sigma Energy Slices -- Fit Parameters' Dependency

Half-sigma energy slices from -4 to +4 sigma looking at fit parameters A₀, b, c from form

A(t) = (A₀ + b * t) / (1 + c * t)

using Run II data and 2/16/16 FESEM thickness data. This data is not "dilution"-subtracted, as I have not done a half-sigma energy slice study for "dilution"-subtracted data from either Run.

Text Document with table media:Run2.Pade11.FitParameters.HalfSigmaSlices.odt

All data, including asymmetry by half-sigma bin for every individual foil, the above plots and data, in a spreadsheet media:Pade11.HalfSigmaSlices.AllData.ods

Best Cuts and Simulation Driven Fit

Run 2, E-cut [-0.5:2] sigma, dilution subtracted

Run 2, E-cut [-1:3] sigma, dilution subtracted

Run 1, E-cut [-0.5:2] sigma, dilution subtracted

Run 1, E-cut [-1:3] sigma, dilution subtracted