Difference between revisions of "Apr 3, 2020 Meeting Minutes"

From Ciswikidb
Jump to: navigation, search
 
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
To be made...
+
==Emails/attachments sent during the previous week==
 +
*None
 +
 
 +
==Post-meeting notes==
 +
*Josh presented GPT simulations showing 2 "DC" pulses ionizing H2 gas and showed results & analysis techniques (histograms, distributions of electrons/ions hitting beam pipe, etc.)
 +
*Josh will...
 +
**Compare beam potential vs. theory to benchmark SC routine
 +
**Reduce bunch charge & pulse length to match Joe's simulation parameters (from ppt presentation)
 +
**Try importing line charge to simulate beam potential
 +
**Check random number generator in GPT - histograms of electron/ion energies aren't as expected.
 +
**Add endcaps to Rmax routine
 +
**See if GPT has an ~easy way to simulate Earth's B-Field in the simulations
 +
*Cristhian showed a graph of beam size (x/y RMS vs. z) for different (first) solenoid B-field scale factors. Also showed a plot of the longitudinal E-Field vs z (from just the e-beam) both with and without the solenoid on. Might not need to worry about ions after z=0.76m.
 +
*Solenoid settings during LifeSize runs are on the LifeSize spreadsheet under "Signal_Stats"
  
 
[[Ionization Effects Meetings | Return to Ionization Effects Meetings]]
 
[[Ionization Effects Meetings | Return to Ionization Effects Meetings]]
  
 
[[Weekly phone call - Apr 3, 2020 | Go to Meeting Page]]
 
[[Weekly phone call - Apr 3, 2020 | Go to Meeting Page]]

Latest revision as of 13:06, 7 April 2020

Emails/attachments sent during the previous week

  • None

Post-meeting notes

  • Josh presented GPT simulations showing 2 "DC" pulses ionizing H2 gas and showed results & analysis techniques (histograms, distributions of electrons/ions hitting beam pipe, etc.)
  • Josh will...
    • Compare beam potential vs. theory to benchmark SC routine
    • Reduce bunch charge & pulse length to match Joe's simulation parameters (from ppt presentation)
    • Try importing line charge to simulate beam potential
    • Check random number generator in GPT - histograms of electron/ion energies aren't as expected.
    • Add endcaps to Rmax routine
    • See if GPT has an ~easy way to simulate Earth's B-Field in the simulations
  • Cristhian showed a graph of beam size (x/y RMS vs. z) for different (first) solenoid B-field scale factors. Also showed a plot of the longitudinal E-Field vs z (from just the e-beam) both with and without the solenoid on. Might not need to worry about ions after z=0.76m.
  • Solenoid settings during LifeSize runs are on the LifeSize spreadsheet under "Signal_Stats"

Return to Ionization Effects Meetings

Go to Meeting Page