Difference between revisions of "Beamline, Radiator and Dump"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| (11 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
# Analysis results (F. Fors): [[media:Bubble_Chamber_Thermal_FF082015.pdf]] [[media:Bubble_Chamber_Thermal_FF082015.pptx]] | # Analysis results (F. Fors): [[media:Bubble_Chamber_Thermal_FF082015.pdf]] [[media:Bubble_Chamber_Thermal_FF082015.pptx]] | ||
| − | * Drawing: [[media: | + | * Drawing: [[media:JL0015733 CU RADIATOR WINDOW ASSY REV A. prelim.pdf]] |
| − | * Thermal Analysis: [[media:ThermalAna_IDL5D01.pdf]] | + | * Thermal Analysis: [[media:ThermalAna_IDL5D01.pdf]] |
| + | * Approved to run up to 10 µA or 100 W (September 2014) | ||
* LCW flow to radiator/dump was measured with: | * LCW flow to radiator/dump was measured with: | ||
# a flow-meter and was found to be 0.9 GPM | # a flow-meter and was found to be 0.9 GPM | ||
| Line 41: | Line 42: | ||
* ''Summary of the Transverse Beam Characterization Measurements in the CEBAF 5 MeV Region: 2014-2015'' | * ''Summary of the Transverse Beam Characterization Measurements in the CEBAF 5 MeV Region: 2014-2015'' | ||
C. Tennant et al. (18 December 2015): [[media:TN-15-052.pdf]] [[media:TN-15-052.docx]] | C. Tennant et al. (18 December 2015): [[media:TN-15-052.pdf]] [[media:TN-15-052.docx]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | = '''2K vesus 4K''' = | ||
| + | * ''4 K SRF Operation of the 10 MeV CEBAF Photo-Injector'' | ||
| + | G. Eremeev, M. Drury, J. Grames, R. Kazimi, M. Poelker, J. Preble, R. Suleiman, Y. Wang, and M.Wright, | ||
| + | Proceedings of 28th Linear Accelerator Conference, LINAC 2016, East Lansing, MI: [[media:Linac16_moplr010.pdf]] | ||
| + | |||
| Line 82: | Line 90: | ||
----- | ----- | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
* Questions: | * Questions: | ||
| Line 89: | Line 99: | ||
# Is the size of the photon dump reasonable? Do we need the hole in the photon dump or we can be fine with just a block of Al. Does this whole service any purpose? I thought of it to try to contain any back scattered electrons. Can Argonne make the photon dump? | # Is the size of the photon dump reasonable? Do we need the hole in the photon dump or we can be fine with just a block of Al. Does this whole service any purpose? I thought of it to try to contain any back scattered electrons. Can Argonne make the photon dump? | ||
| − | = ''' | + | |
| + | |||
| + | = '''First Radiator: Copper Conflat Flange''' = | ||
* Drawing: [[media:ACC2008000-1000.pdf]] | * Drawing: [[media:ACC2008000-1000.pdf]] | ||
* Photos: | * Photos: | ||
| − | [[ | + | |
| − | [[ | + | |
| + | :: [[file:170127_Rad1.jpeg|left|300px|]] | ||
| + | :: [[file:170127_Rad2.jpeg|center|300px|]] | ||
Revision as of 08:57, 26 September 2022
Songsheet and Nomenclature
- Design, installation and released mechanical drawings (dipole + beam line) (change .txt to .tar): media:Bubble_Beamline_Drawings.txt (also here \group\bubble\grames)
- Songsheet and nomenclature media:ACC2008000-1100.pdf
6 mm Cu Radiator/Dump
- Realistic Thermal Analysis:
- Updated spreadsheet with energy deposition at 9.5 and 5 MeV beam energies (first 2 sheets have data binned in 1mm intervals both in Z direction and radially, third sheet has 5 MeV data in 0.5mm bins). All deposited power adds up to about 85% of the beam power. These models assume Gaussian beam with sigma=0.2mm (G. Kharashvili): media:radiator_power.xlsx
- Analysis results (F. Fors): media:Bubble_Chamber_Thermal_FF082015.pdf media:Bubble_Chamber_Thermal_FF082015.pptx
- Drawing: media:JL0015733 CU RADIATOR WINDOW ASSY REV A. prelim.pdf
- Thermal Analysis: media:ThermalAna_IDL5D01.pdf
- Approved to run up to 10 µA or 100 W (September 2014)
- LCW flow to radiator/dump was measured with:
- a flow-meter and was found to be 0.9 GPM
- a bucket and was found to be 2.0 GPM
- LCW temperature is 40°C
Photon Cu Collimator
- Drawing: media:JL0015777_Cu_collimator.pdf
Photon Al Dump
- Drawing: media:JL0009386_Al_photon_dump.pdf
Documentation
- Injector Quick Reference media:injector_quick_reference.pdf
Model
- Elegant (Tennant - September 2015): media:BubbleChamber.ele.Sept.txt media:BubbleChamber.lte.Sept.txt media:BubbleChamber_FIT.ele.txt media:Bubble_Chamber_Twiss_Trends.xlsx
- Elegant (Tennant - December 2013): media:BubbleChamber.ele.txt media:BubbleChamber.lte.txt
- Summary of the Transverse Beam Characterization Measurements in the CEBAF 5 MeV Region: 2014-2015
C. Tennant et al. (18 December 2015): media:TN-15-052.pdf media:TN-15-052.docx
2K vesus 4K
- 4 K SRF Operation of the 10 MeV CEBAF Photo-Injector
G. Eremeev, M. Drury, J. Grames, R. Kazimi, M. Poelker, J. Preble, R. Suleiman, Y. Wang, and M.Wright, Proceedings of 28th Linear Accelerator Conference, LINAC 2016, East Lansing, MI: media:Linac16_moplr010.pdf
DL Magnet
Old Drawings
- The electron beam hitting the radiator will be roughly 0.2 mm diameter. We will allow for 5 mm diameter sweet spot. Using beam position monitors we will know the beam position on the radiator to about 1 mm.
- This 5 mm diameter and a 10 mm diameter in the center of the bubble chamber will define a cone. This way we can determine the size of the holes in the collimator. This cone extend all the way to the photon dump.
- The table where the radiator and collimator sit will be made of Al and the frame that hold the collimator will be made of Al, too.
- Cu Radiator: media:Bubble_Cu_Radiator.pdf
- Cu Collimator: media:Bubble_Cu_Collimator.pdf
- Al Photon Dump: media:Al_Photon_Dump.pdf
- Questions:
- Is the assumption about the cone fine. Do want the 10 mm diameter be at the center of the bubble chamber or at the end of the chamber entrance collimator.
- Is the 5mm diameter what we want to use?
- Is the size of the photon dump reasonable? Do we need the hole in the photon dump or we can be fine with just a block of Al. Does this whole service any purpose? I thought of it to try to contain any back scattered electrons. Can Argonne make the photon dump?
First Radiator: Copper Conflat Flange
- Drawing: media:ACC2008000-1000.pdf
- Photos:
