Difference between revisions of "Beamline, Radiator and Dump"

From Ciswikidb
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 13: Line 13:
 
# a flow-meter and was found to be 0.9 GPM
 
# a flow-meter and was found to be 0.9 GPM
 
# a bucket and was found to be 2.0 GPM
 
# a bucket and was found to be 2.0 GPM
* LCW temperature is ???
+
* LCW temperature is 40°C (???)
  
  

Revision as of 11:13, 20 July 2015

Songsheet and Nomenclature

  • Design, installation and released mechanical drawings (dipole + beam line) are here \group\bubble\grames
  • Songsheet and nomenclature media:ACC2008000-1100.pdf


6 mm Cu Radiator/Dump

  1. a flow-meter and was found to be 0.9 GPM
  2. a bucket and was found to be 2.0 GPM
  • LCW temperature is 40°C (???)


Photon Cu Collimator


Photon Al Dump


Documentation


Model


DL Magnet

Drawings

  • The electron beam hitting the radiator will be roughly 0.2 mm diameter. We will allow for 5 mm diameter sweet spot. Using beam position monitors we will know the beam position on the radiator to about 1 mm.
  • This 5 mm diameter and a 10 mm diameter in the center of the bubble chamber will define a cone. This way we can determine the size of the holes in the collimator. This cone extend all the way to the photon dump.
  • The table where the radiator and collimator sit will be made of Al and the frame that hold the collimator will be made of Al, too.



Bubble Beamline elev 1.jpg


Bubble Beamline elev 2.jpg


Bubble Cu radiator.jpg




  • Questions:
  1. Is the assumption about the cone fine. Do want the 10 mm diameter be at the center of the bubble chamber or at the end of the chamber entrance collimator.
  2. Is the 5mm diameter what we want to use?
  3. Is the size of the photon dump reasonable? Do we need the hole in the photon dump or we can be fine with just a block of Al. Does this whole service any purpose? I thought of it to try to contain any back scattered electrons. Can Argonne make the photon dump?