Difference between revisions of "GPT/IBSimu Benchmarking Final Exam"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | ( | + | Here are some ideas for a complete benchmarking simulation test between GPT and IBSimu. Both programs will be used to create the same simulation and (ideally) achieve the same results when everything (ionization, field maps, secondary electrons, etc.) are included. |
| + | |||
| + | ==What Should Be Included== | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===Ionization Routine=== | ||
| + | *Ionization | ||
| + | **Same ion production rate | ||
| + | **Same ionization cross section for a given species | ||
| + | **Same gas density profile (constant for GPT) | ||
| + | *Secondary electrons | ||
| + | **Same energy distribution (SEDCS in GPT) | ||
| + | **Secondary electron yield? | ||
| + | |||
[[Weekly phone call - July 10, 2020 | Return to Meeting Page]] | [[Weekly phone call - July 10, 2020 | Return to Meeting Page]] | ||
Revision as of 12:31, 10 July 2020
Here are some ideas for a complete benchmarking simulation test between GPT and IBSimu. Both programs will be used to create the same simulation and (ideally) achieve the same results when everything (ionization, field maps, secondary electrons, etc.) are included.
What Should Be Included
Ionization Routine
- Ionization
- Same ion production rate
- Same ionization cross section for a given species
- Same gas density profile (constant for GPT)
- Secondary electrons
- Same energy distribution (SEDCS in GPT)
- Secondary electron yield?