Difference between revisions of "GTS meeting 5 09 17"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| (5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
== Software Tasks == | == Software Tasks == | ||
| − | # Verdi laser control into EPICS | + | # Verdi laser control into EPICS with a serial communication (used before) |
# X stage and Y stage STAC5 for QE steering lens | # X stage and Y stage STAC5 for QE steering lens | ||
| − | # | + | # New laser Amplifier |
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
# Some preliminary data on ion collector biased positive and negative: [[Media:Downstream collector data vs beam current pos and neg bias.xlsx]] | # Some preliminary data on ion collector biased positive and negative: [[Media:Downstream collector data vs beam current pos and neg bias.xlsx]] | ||
# Calculations of the ion current for the GTS vacuum and beam current parameters using Cornell's and Eduard Pozdeyev's paper show ion current bellow 0.1 pA. | # Calculations of the ion current for the GTS vacuum and beam current parameters using Cornell's and Eduard Pozdeyev's paper show ion current bellow 0.1 pA. | ||
| − | # Comments form Steve Full at Cornell: "We did take measurements without N2 gas leaks at 10 mA, but | + | # Comments form Steve Full at Cornell: |
| − | 1) We weren’t clearing any ions (I seriously doubt this - 28 V should’ve been sufficient to clear all ions, based on our measurements with gas leaks) | + | "We did take measurements without N2 gas leaks at 10 mA, but '''we didn’t observe any ion current change as a function of clearing voltage'''. |
| − | 2) There was too much background noise in the injector when we did the experiments. (This seems much more likely)." | + | Some measurements: |
| + | 0.192 pA @ 0 V | ||
| + | 0.192 pA @ 28 V. | ||
| + | I believe there are two possible explanations: | ||
| + | 1) We weren’t clearing any ions (I seriously doubt this - 28 V should’ve been sufficient to clear all ions, based on our measurements with gas leaks) | ||
| + | 2) There was too much background noise in the injector when we did the experiments. (This seems much more likely)." | ||
Latest revision as of 08:35, 11 May 2017
Beta Calculations
Software Tasks
- Verdi laser control into EPICS with a serial communication (used before)
- X stage and Y stage STAC5 for QE steering lens
- New laser Amplifier
Ion collectors update
- Downstream collector biased positive and negative
- What is charging up / discharging
- Some preliminary data on ion collector biased positive and negative: Media:Downstream collector data vs beam current pos and neg bias.xlsx
- Calculations of the ion current for the GTS vacuum and beam current parameters using Cornell's and Eduard Pozdeyev's paper show ion current bellow 0.1 pA.
- Comments form Steve Full at Cornell:
"We did take measurements without N2 gas leaks at 10 mA, but we didn’t observe any ion current change as a function of clearing voltage. Some measurements: 0.192 pA @ 0 V 0.192 pA @ 28 V. I believe there are two possible explanations: 1) We weren’t clearing any ions (I seriously doubt this - 28 V should’ve been sufficient to clear all ions, based on our measurements with gas leaks) 2) There was too much background noise in the injector when we did the experiments. (This seems much more likely)."