Difference between revisions of "GTS meeting 7 25 16"

From Ciswikidb
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 8: Line 8:
 
* The cathode is amazingly robust!
 
* The cathode is amazingly robust!
 
** [[File:Slide10.jpg]]
 
** [[File:Slide10.jpg]]
 +
 +
* By moving a hand-held magnet around the gun chamber, "something changed" and now there is field emission starting at around 230kV.
 +
** This induced several gun HV trips (on current) while attempting to operate at 300kV.
 +
** We tried Kr processing at no avail. We are then operating at 225kV.
 +
 +
* The QE scanner is operational!
 +
** The following scan was taken after doing Kr processing. This is why the QE in the un-damaged area is smaller than 2.5%.
 +
** [[File:Comparison between QE map and damaged cathode picture.jpg]]

Revision as of 10:56, 25 July 2016

  • 1 mA semi-stable running for nearly 7 hours: [1]
    • At 300kV, with anode bias at +1500 V, and
    • Better beam focusing and centering in the viewers, rather than on the solenoids.
    • We think is the latter that made the greatest contribution to high current beam
    • Even so, we still see sudden "photocathode-anode arcing" that reduces the QE on the illuminated area, but only slightly
    • Slide09..jpg
  • The cathode is amazingly robust!
    • Slide10.jpg
  • By moving a hand-held magnet around the gun chamber, "something changed" and now there is field emission starting at around 230kV.
    • This induced several gun HV trips (on current) while attempting to operate at 300kV.
    • We tried Kr processing at no avail. We are then operating at 225kV.
  • The QE scanner is operational!
    • The following scan was taken after doing Kr processing. This is why the QE in the un-damaged area is smaller than 2.5%.
    • Comparison between QE map and damaged cathode picture.jpg