Difference between revisions of "Gabriel Palacios-Serrano"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
*[[Media:Gabriel's thesis outline draft Feb 2019 Rev00.docx]] | *[[Media:Gabriel's thesis outline draft Feb 2019 Rev00.docx]] | ||
| − | This | + | GPT results for the sphere long anode 9cm gap at -200 kV. This was produced using Yan's GTS parameters. We are trying to find out why is the measurements and simulated emittance so different. |
| + | [[Media:GTS_GPT_2.pptx]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | GPT results for the sphere long anode 9cm gap at -200 kV. This was produced using Yan's GTS parameters. We are trying to find out why is the measurements and simulated emittance so different. | ||
[[Media:GTS_GPT_1.pptx]] | [[Media:GTS_GPT_1.pptx]] | ||
| − | + | CST and GPT info for the T-shape, mushroom, small mushroom, sphere small anode 6cm gap, sphere long anode 6cm gap, sphere long anode 9cm gap at -200 kV. This file has the CEBAF parameters. | |
[[Media:Guns_CST_1.pptx]] | [[Media:Guns_CST_1.pptx]] | ||
Revision as of 18:47, 17 February 2019
GPT results for the sphere long anode 9cm gap at -200 kV. This was produced using Yan's GTS parameters. We are trying to find out why is the measurements and simulated emittance so different. Media:GTS_GPT_2.pptx
GPT results for the sphere long anode 9cm gap at -200 kV. This was produced using Yan's GTS parameters. We are trying to find out why is the measurements and simulated emittance so different. Media:GTS_GPT_1.pptx
CST and GPT info for the T-shape, mushroom, small mushroom, sphere small anode 6cm gap, sphere long anode 6cm gap, sphere long anode 9cm gap at -200 kV. This file has the CEBAF parameters. Media:Guns_CST_1.pptx
Preliminary GPT results for the T-cathode vs Mushroom vs Sphere at -200 kV. This file has the CEBAF parameters. This is the same as the previous entry but shows extra slides with comparisons of the three cathodes wth one metric as requested by Matt. Media:New_CEBAF_gun_CST_4_2.pptx
Preliminary GPT results for the T-cathode vs Mushroom vs Sphere at -200 kV. This file has the CEBAF parameters. Media:New_CEBAF_gun_CST_4.pptx
Preliminary GPT results for the T-cathode vs Mushroom vs Sphere at -200 kV. Media:New_CEBAF_gun_CST_3.pptx
Test shields 1 to 7 simulations on CST for the -200 kV new CEBAF gun (and includes a bit of the GTS gun field maps at 200 kV w/small anode). Media:New_CEBAF_gun_CST_2.pptx
Test shields 1,2,3 & 4 simulations on CST for the -200 kV new CEBAF gun. Media:New_CEBAF_gun_CST_1.pdf Media:New_CEBAF_gun_CST_1.pptx Media:New_CEBAF_gun_CST_1_w-noshield.pdf Media:New_CEBAF_gun_CST_1_w-noshield.pptx
Field maps for the -200 kV new CEBAF gun @-130 kV and -180 kV. Media:Field_maps_for_the_new_CEBAF_gun_at_130_kV_and_180_kV.pdf
Results for CST microwave studio simulations of the -300 kV GTS gun. Media:GTS_CST_1.pdf
Corrections on the simulation results for the -200 kV CEBAF gun paper. Media:COMSOL_corrected.pdf
Document with details on the Pierce geometry angle variations for the -300 kV GTS gun. Media:GTS COMSOL 8.pdf
COMSOL simulations for 300kV and 200kV guns upper shields Media:300kV_COMSOL_upper_shields.pdf Media:200kV_COMSOL_upper_shield.pdf
COMSOL modeling comparing CEBAF 130kV white insulator no shed versus Upgrade 200kV black insulator with shed. (Both guns biased at -200kV) Media:COMSOL comparison CEBAF 130kV to 200kV upgrade.pdf Media:COMSOL ceramic conductivity.pdf