Difference between revisions of "June 17, 2020 - 200 kV gun options"

From Ciswikidb
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
;Three options in September
+
;Three options this Fall...
 
#Take a few days to HV condition
 
#Take a few days to HV condition
 
#Try the new small shed electrode in, bake, HV condition
 
#Try the new small shed electrode in, bake, HV condition
 
#Replace HV chamber with larger 300 kV HV chamber (TL-1137 or GTS)
 
#Replace HV chamber with larger 300 kV HV chamber (TL-1137 or GTS)
 
+
#Carlos' slides [[Media:Evaluating R30 insulator guns for potential use in CEBAF.pptx]]
;Carlos' slides...
+
#Sajini's slides with details on beam position, emittance, and anode-cathode electric fields for shifted vs tilted anode [[Media:Angled anode 6_2020_2 vs shifted anode analysis by Sajini.pptx]]
  
 
;Our last planning meeting (January 8, 2020)
 
;Our last planning meeting (January 8, 2020)
 
* Plan and time line [[media:200108_plan.docx]] [[media:200108_plan.pdf]]
 
* Plan and time line [[media:200108_plan.docx]] [[media:200108_plan.pdf]]
 
* Mamun's analysis of SS small shield processed w/ Kr at CEBAF [[media:200108_Mamun.pptx]]
 
* Mamun's analysis of SS small shield processed w/ Kr at CEBAF [[media:200108_Mamun.pptx]]

Latest revision as of 10:34, 17 June 2020

Three options this Fall...
  1. Take a few days to HV condition
  2. Try the new small shed electrode in, bake, HV condition
  3. Replace HV chamber with larger 300 kV HV chamber (TL-1137 or GTS)
  4. Carlos' slides Media:Evaluating R30 insulator guns for potential use in CEBAF.pptx
  5. Sajini's slides with details on beam position, emittance, and anode-cathode electric fields for shifted vs tilted anode Media:Angled anode 6_2020_2 vs shifted anode analysis by Sajini.pptx
Our last planning meeting (January 8, 2020)