Difference between revisions of "Kerr - June 10, 2016"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "Today I graphed the first set of data taken with the optics set up. From a 90 degree polarization (vertical), I decreased the angle by 5 with the rotary polarizer and took t...") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Today I graphed the first set of data taken with the optics set up. | Today I graphed the first set of data taken with the optics set up. | ||
| − | From a 90 degree polarization (vertical), I decreased the angle by 5 with the rotary polarizer and took the corresponding power measurement. | + | |
| − | At 0 degrees, naturally the measurement of power looked much like when the laser was turned off (11 nanoWatts). | + | *From a 90 degree polarization (vertical), I decreased the angle by 5 with the rotary polarizer and took the corresponding power measurement. |
| + | *At 0 degrees, naturally the measurement of power looked much like when the laser was turned off (11 nanoWatts). | ||
| + | *I used ND 2 | ||
| + | |||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | |||
| + | Today I also found some useful information regarding our Iron Alloys | ||
Revision as of 14:55, 10 June 2016
Today I graphed the first set of data taken with the optics set up.
- From a 90 degree polarization (vertical), I decreased the angle by 5 with the rotary polarizer and took the corresponding power measurement.
- At 0 degrees, naturally the measurement of power looked much like when the laser was turned off (11 nanoWatts).
- I used ND 2
Today I also found some useful information regarding our Iron Alloys