Difference between revisions of "October 27, 2015 - Mott Group Meeting"

From Ciswikidb
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 10: Line 10:
 
::*Emittance at MQJ0L02: measurements made for X/Y planes, on-line results look OK, but cuts to improve
 
::*Emittance at MQJ0L02: measurements made for X/Y planes, on-line results look OK, but cuts to improve
 
::*Energy spread: harp scans at 3 different pairs of quad measurements, should be consistent with same emittance/Twiss at MQJ0L02
 
::*Energy spread: harp scans at 3 different pairs of quad measurements, should be consistent with same emittance/Twiss at MQJ0L02
−
 
 
# Discuss Charlie's writing assignments
 
# Discuss Charlie's writing assignments
 
::* [[media:151016_Outline.docx]]
 
::* [[media:151016_Outline.docx]]
 
::* Please share your updates and material on the Box account
 
::* Please share your updates and material on the Box account
 +
 +
To Do
 +
 +
# (Joe) summarize process and results to measure beam energy
 +
# (Joe) what photocathode did we use for Run I?
 +
# (Daniel, Riad, Tim, Marcy) Corroborate the Lebow and FESEM measurements with foil rate measurements to assign X-axis and uncertainty for each foil
 +
# (Tim) Explore and recommend heuristic fit approach for target thickness
 +
# (Riad) Incorporate energy spread correction in data analysis
 +
# (Daniel) Summarize Run II with cuts (T=+/- 2sigma, E=-1:3 sigma)
 +
# (Daniel) Compute asymmetry is 0.5 sigma slices to explore dependence and determine appropriate energy cut
 +
# (Marty, Tim, Riad, Joe) - Resolve approach for second scattering distribution
 +
 +
  
 
== Blue Jeans and Wiki ==
 
== Blue Jeans and Wiki ==

Latest revision as of 21:17, 28 October 2015

Let's meet on Tuesday October 27 @ 11am in TED 2504 for a post-Run II discussion.

Agenda

  1. Run II and analysis tasks
  • Rate v. Thickness: X-axis (compare w/ previous rates measurement, Lebow, FESEM), Y-axis (time and energy cuts)
  • Asymmetry vs. Energy: X-axis (beam momentum results), Y-axis (time and energy cuts)
  • Asymmetry vs. Thickness: X-axis (rate, Lebow, FESEM), Y-axis (time and energy cuts)
  • Momentum vs. Gradient: X-axis (gradient), Y-axis (beam positions, DL, earth, steering)
  • Emittance at MQJ0L02: measurements made for X/Y planes, on-line results look OK, but cuts to improve
  • Energy spread: harp scans at 3 different pairs of quad measurements, should be consistent with same emittance/Twiss at MQJ0L02
  1. Discuss Charlie's writing assignments

To Do

  1. (Joe) summarize process and results to measure beam energy
  2. (Joe) what photocathode did we use for Run I?
  3. (Daniel, Riad, Tim, Marcy) Corroborate the Lebow and FESEM measurements with foil rate measurements to assign X-axis and uncertainty for each foil
  4. (Tim) Explore and recommend heuristic fit approach for target thickness
  5. (Riad) Incorporate energy spread correction in data analysis
  6. (Daniel) Summarize Run II with cuts (T=+/- 2sigma, E=-1:3 sigma)
  7. (Daniel) Compute asymmetry is 0.5 sigma slices to explore dependence and determine appropriate energy cut
  8. (Marty, Tim, Riad, Joe) - Resolve approach for second scattering distribution


Blue Jeans and Wiki

Toll Free Phone number: 1-888-240-2560
Int'l Call Phone numbers: http://bluejeans.com/numbers
Meeting ID: 871029730#
Web connection for desktop sharing: https://bluejeans.com/871029730
Wiki: https://wiki.jlab.org/ciswiki/index.php/October_27,_2015_-_Mott_Group_Meeting
Retrieved from "https://wiki.jlab.org/ciswiki/index.php?title=October_27,_2015_-_Mott_Group_Meeting&oldid=7267"