Difference between revisions of "PPB - Aug 11, 2021"

From Ciswikidb
Jump to: navigation, search
(Meeting Notes & Objectives Status)
(Weekly Objective(s))
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 16: Line 16:
 
* Include quads after collimator in simulation - Mark
 
* Include quads after collimator in simulation - Mark
 
* Preliminary optimization for simulation with e-/e+ -Mark
 
* Preliminary optimization for simulation with e-/e+ -Mark
 +
*Address GPT normalization with Bas -Mark
  
 
== Meeting Notes &  Objectives Status ==
 
== Meeting Notes &  Objectives Status ==
*Dipole straight to dump
+
*3rd dipole straight to dump.
 
*Target geometry curve, thickness, ect..
 
*Target geometry curve, thickness, ect..
*beam spot size, target rotation averages the target geometry, 100-200 um huge energy deposition  
+
*Beam spot size, target rotation averages the target geometry, 100-200 um huge energy deposition  
*quad after collimator
+
*Quad after collimator
*cw long bunch issues, chopper cavity
+
*CW long bunch issues. Chopper cavity?
 +
*Consideration for achromatic conditions. Do we want it to be achromatic and where?

Latest revision as of 11:47, 11 August 2021

Meeting Info

We will meet on Wed (UAS 9am, JLab 11am, IJCLab 5pm)
Bluejeans: https://bluejeans.com/405130883/4307
Code to start the meeting 4307

Aug 11 Agenda

Weekly Objective(s)

  • e+/e- Geant4 output and comparison -Sami & Mark
  • connect with D. Douglas for undulator emittance control-Ryan
  • Include quads after collimator in simulation - Mark
  • Preliminary optimization for simulation with e-/e+ -Mark
  • Address GPT normalization with Bas -Mark

Meeting Notes & Objectives Status

  • 3rd dipole straight to dump.
  • Target geometry curve, thickness, ect..
  • Beam spot size, target rotation averages the target geometry, 100-200 um huge energy deposition
  • Quad after collimator
  • CW long bunch issues. Chopper cavity?
  • Consideration for achromatic conditions. Do we want it to be achromatic and where?