Difference between revisions of "PPB - Aug 4, 2021"

From Ciswikidb
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "== Meeting Info == We will meet on Wed ('''UAS 9am''', JLab 11am, IJCLab 5pm) Bluejeans: https://bluejeans.com/405130883/4307 Code to start the meeting 4307 ==Aug 4 Agenda...")
 
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 12: Line 12:
 
* Why PAC proposals might fail?
 
* Why PAC proposals might fail?
 
** Arguments that reversing CEBAF dipole polarities is problematic or costly
 
** Arguments that reversing CEBAF dipole polarities is problematic or costly
** Arguments for a cold start tune-up of CEBAF with low current (duty factor typ. e- 10 uA pulse @ 60 Hz)
+
** Arguments that e+ and e- beam energies cannot be within 5e-4 of one another
 +
** Arguments for a cold start tune-up of CEBAF with low current (10 uA peak @ 60Hz:  VL~6e-4 = 6nA ave, BPM~1.5e-2 = 150 nA)
 
** Arguments for realistic multi-pass acceptance
 
** Arguments for realistic multi-pass acceptance
 +
 +
* How do we coordinate our efforts?
 +
** Mark develop start-to-end model
 +
** Sami explore beam size/angle Geant4
 +
** Andriy will work on target
 +
** Ryan exploring FFA concept
  
 
==Jul 28th Agenda ==
 
==Jul 28th Agenda ==

Latest revision as of 11:50, 4 August 2021

Meeting Info

We will meet on Wed (UAS 9am, JLab 11am, IJCLab 5pm)
Bluejeans: https://bluejeans.com/405130883/4307
Code to start the meeting 4307

Aug 4 Agenda

  • Mark's presentation
    • schematic of layout
    • fraction of e+/e- beam
    • include e- (need Geant4 + standard GPT)
  • Why PAC proposals might fail?
    • Arguments that reversing CEBAF dipole polarities is problematic or costly
    • Arguments that e+ and e- beam energies cannot be within 5e-4 of one another
    • Arguments for a cold start tune-up of CEBAF with low current (10 uA peak @ 60Hz: VL~6e-4 = 6nA ave, BPM~1.5e-2 = 150 nA)
    • Arguments for realistic multi-pass acceptance
  • How do we coordinate our efforts?
    • Mark develop start-to-end model
    • Sami explore beam size/angle Geant4
    • Andriy will work on target
    • Ryan exploring FFA concept

Jul 28th Agenda

  • Positron parameter tables:
media:unpolarized.png
media:polarized.png
  • Discussion

Meeting Notes

  • Small meeting with Eric, Riad, Ryan and Mark
  • Bunch length needs to be confirmed, north linac fractional energy spread acceptance needs to be checked, emittance is a concern
  • possibility of FFA use given the wide energy/momentum spread
  • presentation with table values explained and simulations is being worked on