Difference between revisions of "PPB - Sep 28, 2021"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
* Discussion- Target geometry and beam size effects on emittance | * Discussion- Target geometry and beam size effects on emittance | ||
| + | * Standardize out we look at GPT results, | ||
| + | :* number v. Z | ||
| + | :* energy vs. Z | ||
| + | :* bunchlength vs. Z | ||
| + | :* emittance vs. Z | ||
| + | :* beam size vs. Z | ||
| + | :* polarization vs. Z | ||
* LDRD update - [[media:Grames_Jamboree_v3.pptx]] | * LDRD update - [[media:Grames_Jamboree_v3.pptx]] | ||
* Xelera proposal - A high-power positron converter based on a recirculated liquid metal in-vacuum target | * Xelera proposal - A high-power positron converter based on a recirculated liquid metal in-vacuum target | ||
Revision as of 11:21, 29 September 2021
Meeting Info
We will meet on Wed (UAS 9am, JLab 11am, IJCLab 5pm) Bluejeans: https://bluejeans.com/405130883/4307 Code to start the meeting 4307
Sep 29 Agenda
- Mark- polarized positron capture up to 123 Mev media:Stefani9292021.pptx
- Discussion- Target geometry and beam size effects on emittance
- Standardize out we look at GPT results,
- number v. Z
- energy vs. Z
- bunchlength vs. Z
- emittance vs. Z
- beam size vs. Z
- polarization vs. Z
- LDRD update - media:Grames_Jamboree_v3.pptx
- Xelera proposal - A high-power positron converter based on a recirculated liquid metal in-vacuum target
- Geant4 simulations to evaluate/optimize target thickness for e+ yield/polarization distributions
- Intellectual effort to develop a Phase 2 framework for UITF installation &
- If helpful, could consider a trip to visit your lab
- Sami's vist
Weekly Objective(s)
- Mark: unpolarized optimization
- Sami: two target system