Difference between revisions of "September 18, 2014 - Mott Group Meeting"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
2. Beam study evaluation... | 2. Beam study evaluation... | ||
− | * laser: digital pulsing | + | * laser: digital pulsing vs. picking - depends on Shukui, John |
− | * 31 MHz vs. 62 MHz | + | * 31 MHz vs. 62 MHz - because higher rep rate is better for fiber amplifier |
− | * target | + | * target/beam instrumental systematic study - to validate re-work of target positions |
− | * target rates | + | * target rates - helped by Dan's analyzer improvements |
− | * DAQ rates | + | * DAQ rates - relies on Riad's plan |
3. Dan - Summary of Spring 2014 systematic studies | 3. Dan - Summary of Spring 2014 systematic studies |
Revision as of 09:42, 17 September 2014
We will meet next on Thursday, September 18th at 1:30pm EST and in TL-2236.
Connect by Blue Jeans
1. Dial in +1 888 240 2560 (US or Canada only) 2. Enter Meeting ID: 547248413
Wiki Page
https://wiki.jlab.org/ciswiki/index.php/September_18,_2014_-_Mott_Group_Meeting
Agenda
1. Target Ladder Work
* Fall 2014 Mott Target Replacement and Ladder Position Re-Calibration, media:JLAB-TN-14-026.pdf
2. Beam study evaluation...
* laser: digital pulsing vs. picking - depends on Shukui, John * 31 MHz vs. 62 MHz - because higher rep rate is better for fiber amplifier * target/beam instrumental systematic study - to validate re-work of target positions * target rates - helped by Dan's analyzer improvements * DAQ rates - relies on Riad's plan
3. Dan - Summary of Spring 2014 systematic studies