Difference between revisions of "RGM RC Meeting Jan26 Feb2"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
** Needs to be restored to 'normal' value for the solid targets where we need to run with the beam blocker IN. | ** Needs to be restored to 'normal' value for the solid targets where we need to run with the beam blocker IN. | ||
| − | * running: 25nA LAr until | + | * running: 25nA LAr until today, Tuesday 8pm |
| + | * empty LAr target | ||
| − | * | + | * 1 hour empty target run |
| − | ** single tin foil for | + | ** beam blocker calibration |
| − | ** Ca48 target, beam blocker IN | + | |
| + | * single tin (200 mg/cm2) foil for 36 hours, beam blocker IN | ||
| + | ** have lumi scan for multiple foil tin, had 90 nA | ||
| + | ** beam blocker calibration | ||
| + | |||
| + | * tomorrow, Wednesday morning warm up LAr target to room temp | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Thursday 8am install Ca target | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Ca48 target (240 mg/cm2), beam blocker IN | ||
statistics: | statistics: | ||
[[File:Screenshot from 2022-02-01 13-44-30.png]] | [[File:Screenshot from 2022-02-01 13-44-30.png]] | ||
Latest revision as of 17:47, 1 February 2022
Tuesday, Feb 1, 2022
Short Term Schedule
- status: 6GeV beam, LAr target is full, Beam blocker is OUT
- Note to self: Presently, the alarm limit for the beam_stopper_alarm is raised for running without beam blocker .
- Needs to be restored to 'normal' value for the solid targets where we need to run with the beam blocker IN.
- running: 25nA LAr until today, Tuesday 8pm
- empty LAr target
- 1 hour empty target run
- beam blocker calibration
- single tin (200 mg/cm2) foil for 36 hours, beam blocker IN
- have lumi scan for multiple foil tin, had 90 nA
- beam blocker calibration
- tomorrow, Wednesday morning warm up LAr target to room temp
- Thursday 8am install Ca target
- Ca48 target (240 mg/cm2), beam blocker IN
statistics:
