Difference between revisions of "RGM RC Meeting Feb2 Feb9"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | + | '''Tuesday, Feb 1, SWING''' | |
− | + | * running on LAr until 8pm | |
− | * | + | ** '''6 GeV 25 nA on LAr 70.7M events, runs 15289 - 15802''' |
* empty LAr target | * empty LAr target | ||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
* beam line expert (Eugene) to the rescue: positions target per expert mode | * beam line expert (Eugene) to the rescue: positions target per expert mode | ||
− | * beam blocker calibration from 4 GeV run on Sn(x4) target is uploaded | + | * from Run #15805 on: beam blocker calibration from 4 GeV run on Sn(x4) target is uploaded <-- |
* start running on repositioned target Sn with 90 nA, beam blocker IN | * start running on repositioned target Sn with 90 nA, beam blocker IN | ||
** tdcpcal3 histograms empty goes unnoticed | ** tdcpcal3 histograms empty goes unnoticed | ||
− | + | '''Wednesday, Feb 2, OWL''' | |
− | |||
* continue running on Sn target with 90 nA, beam blocker IN | * continue running on Sn target with 90 nA, beam blocker IN | ||
** some detector/DAQ issues, some beam issues | ** some detector/DAQ issues, some beam issues | ||
Line 24: | Line 23: | ||
*** expert: most prominent with tin target and this might be due to electrical conductivity of the foil | *** expert: most prominent with tin target and this might be due to electrical conductivity of the foil | ||
− | + | '''Wednesday Feb 2, DAY''' | |
− | |||
* warming up LAr target to room temp while running | * warming up LAr target to room temp while running | ||
− | * continue running on | + | * continue running on Sn target with 90 nA, beam blocker IN |
** tdcpcal3 issuefixed | ** tdcpcal3 issuefixed | ||
** more issues: HV drop pcal and ftof in sector 3, ok after turning HVs back on | ** more issues: HV drop pcal and ftof in sector 3, ok after turning HVs back on | ||
Line 35: | Line 33: | ||
* performed beam blocker calibration with Sn target | * performed beam blocker calibration with Sn target | ||
* continue running on Sn target with 90 nA, beam blocker IN | * continue running on Sn target with 90 nA, beam blocker IN | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''Wednesday, Feb 2, SWING''' | ||
+ | * continue running on Sn target with 90 nA, beam blocker IN | ||
+ | * from Run#15819 on, beam blocker calibration from 4 GeV run on Sn(x4) target is uploaded <-- | ||
+ | |||
= Statistics = | = Statistics = | ||
+ | [[File:Screenshot from 2022-02-02 15-12-20.png]] |
Revision as of 16:14, 2 February 2022
Tuesday, Feb 1, SWING
* running on LAr until 8pm ** 6 GeV 25 nA on LAr 70.7M events, runs 15289 - 15802 * empty LAr target * 1 hour empty target run, 150nA, beam blocker IN * beam blocker calibration
* insert single foil Sn (200 mg/cm2) target * beam blocker calibration for 6 GeV on single foil Sn target ** noticed that target cannot be in beam * beam line expert (Eugene) to the rescue: positions target per expert mode * from Run #15805 on: beam blocker calibration from 4 GeV run on Sn(x4) target is uploaded <-- * start running on repositioned target Sn with 90 nA, beam blocker IN ** tdcpcal3 histograms empty goes unnoticed
Wednesday, Feb 2, OWL
* continue running on Sn target with 90 nA, beam blocker IN ** some detector/DAQ issues, some beam issues ** tdcpcal3 histograms empty goes unnoticed ** BST has noisy strips with SN target and in beam *** expert: most prominent with tin target and this might be due to electrical conductivity of the foil
Wednesday Feb 2, DAY
* warming up LAr target to room temp while running * continue running on Sn target with 90 nA, beam blocker IN ** tdcpcal3 issuefixed ** more issues: HV drop pcal and ftof in sector 3, ok after turning HVs back on
* BST noisy strips: access hall to make a test with target motor off, no change
* performed beam blocker calibration with Sn target * continue running on Sn target with 90 nA, beam blocker IN
Wednesday, Feb 2, SWING
* continue running on Sn target with 90 nA, beam blocker IN * from Run#15819 on, beam blocker calibration from 4 GeV run on Sn(x4) target is uploaded <--