Difference between revisions of "RGM RC Meeting Jan26 Feb2"

From clas12-run
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 8: Line 8:
 
** Needs to be restored to 'normal' value for the solid targets where we need to run with the beam blocker IN.
 
** Needs to be restored to 'normal' value for the solid targets where we need to run with the beam blocker IN.
  
* running:  25nA LAr until Wednesday SWING
+
* running:  25nA LAr until today, Tuesday 8pm
 +
* empty LAr target
  
* next:
+
* 1 hour empty target run
** single tin foil for ? days, beam blocker IN
+
** beam blocker calibration
** Ca48 target, beam blocker IN
+
 
 +
* single tin (200 mg/cm2) foil for 36 hours, beam blocker IN
 +
** have lumi scan for multiple foil tin, had 90 nA
 +
** beam blocker calibration
 +
 
 +
* tomorrow, Wednesday  morning warm up LAr target to room temp
 +
 
 +
* Thursday 8am install Ca target
 +
 
 +
* Ca48 target (240 mg/cm2), beam blocker IN
  
 
statistics:
 
statistics:
  
 
[[File:Screenshot from 2022-02-01 13-44-30.png]]
 
[[File:Screenshot from 2022-02-01 13-44-30.png]]

Latest revision as of 17:47, 1 February 2022

Tuesday, Feb 1, 2022

Short Term Schedule

  • status: 6GeV beam, LAr target is full, Beam blocker is OUT
  • Note to self: Presently, the alarm limit for the beam_stopper_alarm is raised for running without beam blocker .
    • Needs to be restored to 'normal' value for the solid targets where we need to run with the beam blocker IN.
  • running: 25nA LAr until today, Tuesday 8pm
  • empty LAr target
  • 1 hour empty target run
    • beam blocker calibration
  • single tin (200 mg/cm2) foil for 36 hours, beam blocker IN
    • have lumi scan for multiple foil tin, had 90 nA
    • beam blocker calibration
  • tomorrow, Wednesday morning warm up LAr target to room temp
  • Thursday 8am install Ca target
  • Ca48 target (240 mg/cm2), beam blocker IN

statistics:

Screenshot from 2022-02-01 13-44-30.png