Difference between revisions of "Meeting 4 December 2018"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
'''SUMMARY OF THE DISCUSSION''' | '''SUMMARY OF THE DISCUSSION''' | ||
− | CPS DOCUMENT | + | [https://wiki.jlab.org/cuawiki/images/0/06/CPS_document-rev8.pdf CPS DOCUMENT REV8] |
* Discussion about status of document updates: | * Discussion about status of document updates: |
Revision as of 14:18, 6 December 2018
ACTION ITEMS
- (Jixie/Dustin/Donal) Address the comments on compatibilty with polarized target as requested in TAC and in Review Report from Aug 2018, e.g. estimate relative uncertainty of target polarization due to
- (Jixie) radiation damage caused by electron-positron pair production and target rotation
- (Dustin) Target rotation (mechanical and local damage) - review the reports by JLab and by Chris Keith and make additions and/or modifications in CPS document as needed
- (David H.) Overall editing to address report comment that narrative doesn't flow smoothly and errors in the figure captions
- (David H.) Create an outline of a NIM article in Overleaf
- (Bogdan/Rolf/Tanja/...) Start more detailed draft of NIM article based on David's outline
- (Tanja with Dustin/Donal/Gabriel/Igor) Create first draft of an executive summary for a possible NSF Mid-Scale Research Instrumentation proposal
SUMMARY OF THE DISCUSSION
- Discussion about status of document updates:
- Jixie working on FLUKA simulations on radiation damage estimates - results expected in next two weeks
- Discussion about uncertainty due to target rotation and local radiation damage
- if ignore radiation damage, then independent of e-beam - all mechanical motion/shock
- local radiation damage - examine area of overlap of volume exposed to beam and NMR, if total overlap, then know polarization from NMR
- practical consideration of how to build coil in relation to target rotation - more loops then smaller signal to noise - test setup in progress
POSSIBLE PUBLICATION IN NIM
- Start with an outline of sections and then fill in with material from CPS document
- Aiming for instrumentation paper, so not all pieces of current technical document, e.g. regarding the science, may be needed
- Aim for putting together an initial draft by 2019 Hall A/C Winter meeting and solicit feedback
CPS CONSTRUCTION
- Discussion about MSRI program
- Competition is NSF-wide
- There are two classifications depending on funds requested (RI-1 is $6 million to below $20 million) and two categories within: 1) Implementation (e.g., procurement, assembly, construction, commissioning) and 2) Design (e.g., preparations for future mid-scale and larger scale infrastructure. Compared to regular proposals, a larger emphasis is placed on scientific justification, research community priority, broader impacts, and project execution plan.
- Preliminary proposals are due on 19 February 2019. Full proposals are due 20 May and by invitation only.
- Compact Photon Source project would likely be RI-1/Implementation. Favorable points include that CPS offers access to unique science that cannot be done otherwise, is basically ready to go, and has community support. Some brainstorming notes:
- Exclusive photoproduction with very small cross section, c.f. 12 GeV program initially (rare processes) - isolate very small signal to really understand structure
- novel technology, gain in science, other applications
- K_Long also aimed at rare processes, where CPS has huge benefit - may appear as other application in proposal as not yet approved by PAC
- Include: CPS and polarized target
- Highest priority: write an executive summary draft - unique science summarized in an easily understandable way for people outside NP. Aim to have a first draft within two weeks
NEXT MEETING: TUESDAY 8 JANUARY 2019 AT 3PM (EST)