Difference between revisions of "General EEEMCal Meeting Summary 6/16/23"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "Participants: Cristiano, Sasha, Carlos, Larry, Carlos Y., Tanja, Hamlet, Julien, Renee, Hrachya, Julie, Artur, Rosi, Joerg, Olivier (Crytur-USA), Ioana, Vardan, Yeran, Dmitry...") |
|||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
− | SIPM SPECS DISCUSSION | + | SIPM SPECS DISCUSSION (All) |
− | * EIC Project requests SiPM specs table for EEEMCAL | + | * EIC Project requests SiPM specs table for EEEMCAL: [https://brookhavenlab.sharepoint.com/:x:/s/EICPublicSharingDocs/EQQCeLzF9ZJHqoeKsSsp29cBwyoFKEnDMcghuQJnfep-NQ?e=LGpvDX Official spreadsheet at this link] |
− | * Voltage is important if light is not mixed up well - for crystals the light is | + | * Voltage is important if light is not mixed up well - for crystals the light is mixed well and uniform and not much sensitivity is expected |
+ | |||
+ | * Variation of operating voltage of tray | ||
+ | ::* Current design has an array of 3x3 or 4x4 SiPMs in a matrix with one output per matrix | ||
+ | ::* May need to comment on sensitivity to gain variations between individual SiPMs - check JLab studies | ||
+ | |||
+ | * When listing specs keep in mind the variations - tolerances | ||
+ | ::* Efficiency cannot be changed by changing operating voltage | ||
+ | |||
+ | * SiPM review is expected for July 2023 | ||
* Action Item: collect all documentation on tests carried out at IJCLab-Orsay and JLab and check table entries | * Action Item: collect all documentation on tests carried out at IJCLab-Orsay and JLab and check table entries | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ENGINEERING UPDATES (Julien) | ||
+ | |||
+ | * One of main focus areas is clearances with other infrastructure, e.g., the beam pipe and the DIRC frame - discussions are ongoing between EEEMCAL representatives (Julien, Jim, Josh) and the EIC Project technical team | ||
+ | |||
+ | * One the integration/installation side of the EEEMCAL into the DIRC frame the rails option is being studied in details | ||
+ | ::* assembly depends on positioning of the rails | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Overall, need assembly space at BNL for the EEEMCAL | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Discussion about space for cables and stress on cables in the assembly | ||
+ | ::* general idea is to use stretchers, but more studies are planned | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | EEEMCAL ORGANIZATION (Tanja, Carlos) |
Revision as of 16:55, 16 June 2023
Participants: Cristiano, Sasha, Carlos, Larry, Carlos Y., Tanja, Hamlet, Julien, Renee, Hrachya, Julie, Artur, Rosi, Joerg, Olivier (Crytur-USA), Ioana, Vardan, Yeran, Dmitry
SIPM SPECS DISCUSSION (All)
- EIC Project requests SiPM specs table for EEEMCAL: Official spreadsheet at this link
- Voltage is important if light is not mixed up well - for crystals the light is mixed well and uniform and not much sensitivity is expected
- Variation of operating voltage of tray
- Current design has an array of 3x3 or 4x4 SiPMs in a matrix with one output per matrix
- May need to comment on sensitivity to gain variations between individual SiPMs - check JLab studies
- When listing specs keep in mind the variations - tolerances
- Efficiency cannot be changed by changing operating voltage
- SiPM review is expected for July 2023
- Action Item: collect all documentation on tests carried out at IJCLab-Orsay and JLab and check table entries
ENGINEERING UPDATES (Julien)
- One of main focus areas is clearances with other infrastructure, e.g., the beam pipe and the DIRC frame - discussions are ongoing between EEEMCAL representatives (Julien, Jim, Josh) and the EIC Project technical team
- One the integration/installation side of the EEEMCAL into the DIRC frame the rails option is being studied in details
- assembly depends on positioning of the rails
- Overall, need assembly space at BNL for the EEEMCAL
- Discussion about space for cables and stress on cables in the assembly
- general idea is to use stretchers, but more studies are planned
EEEMCAL ORGANIZATION (Tanja, Carlos)