Difference between revisions of "Simulation Tasks - collection"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | * Implement EEEMCal ('''contact: Carlos''') | + | * Implement EEEMCal ('''contact: [mailto:munoz@jlab.org Carlos]''') |
| − | * Implement barrel homogeneous EMCal ('''contact: Nathaly''') | + | * Implement barrel homogeneous EMCal ('''contact: [mailto:nathaly@mit.edu Nathaly]''') |
* Compare different reconstruction algorithms | * Compare different reconstruction algorithms | ||
| − | * Investigate discrimination between single photon and merged photons from pi0 decay based on cluster tower energy distribution; same for e/pi separation - possibly explore machine learning application ('''contact: Renee''') | + | * Investigate discrimination between single photon and merged photons from pi0 decay based on cluster tower energy distribution; same for e/pi separation - possibly explore machine learning application ('''contact: [mailto:renee.fatemi@uky.edu Renee]''') |
* Hybrid calorimeter clustering | * Hybrid calorimeter clustering | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
* Light transport going beyond summing up GEANT4 hits | * Light transport going beyond summing up GEANT4 hits | ||
| − | * Determine impact of calorimeter support structure on physics performance; define module geometry ('''contact: Vardan, Arthur''') | + | * Determine impact of calorimeter support structure on physics performance; define module geometry ('''contact: [mailto:tadevosn@jlab.org Vardan], Arthur''') |
::* study/conclude on the tolerance for the size of the gaps between modules (defined by the alveolar and other support elements); also for the transition region between two calorimeters. | ::* study/conclude on the tolerance for the size of the gaps between modules (defined by the alveolar and other support elements); also for the transition region between two calorimeters. | ||
* Angular (rapidity) dependencies: for non-projective geometry for modules with the same length, the EMCal depth seen by the particle will depend on rapidity (with 45 degrees to the beam line it will be a factor of sqrt(2) larger compared to 0 degree). We know that e/h separation will be affected (shower profile), but simple E/p matching performance for eID may be affected too (deeper EMCal - more probability for charged hadron to shower); also the affect of gaps will be different with the angle. | * Angular (rapidity) dependencies: for non-projective geometry for modules with the same length, the EMCal depth seen by the particle will depend on rapidity (with 45 degrees to the beam line it will be a factor of sqrt(2) larger compared to 0 degree). We know that e/h separation will be affected (shower profile), but simple E/p matching performance for eID may be affected too (deeper EMCal - more probability for charged hadron to shower); also the affect of gaps will be different with the angle. | ||
| − | * Comparison of simulation with test beam data (electrons, pions, etc) and find the ways for simulation tuning (e.g. light transport model and/or non-uniformity map, etc.) - '''contacts: Petr,''' | + | * Comparison of simulation with test beam data (electrons, pions, etc) and find the ways for simulation tuning (e.g. light transport model and/or non-uniformity map, etc.) - '''contacts: [mailto:petrs@jlab.org Petr],''' |
| − | * Detector Design Optimization ('''contact: Cristiano''') | + | * Detector Design Optimization ('''contact: [mailto:cfanelli@mit.edu Cristiano]''') |
* ... | * ... | ||
Latest revision as of 09:45, 17 May 2021
- Implement EEEMCal (contact: Carlos)
- Implement barrel homogeneous EMCal (contact: Nathaly)
- Compare different reconstruction algorithms
- Investigate discrimination between single photon and merged photons from pi0 decay based on cluster tower energy distribution; same for e/pi separation - possibly explore machine learning application (contact: Renee)
- Hybrid calorimeter clustering
- see JLab HyCal
- Light transport going beyond summing up GEANT4 hits
- Determine impact of calorimeter support structure on physics performance; define module geometry (contact: Vardan, Arthur)
- study/conclude on the tolerance for the size of the gaps between modules (defined by the alveolar and other support elements); also for the transition region between two calorimeters.
- Angular (rapidity) dependencies: for non-projective geometry for modules with the same length, the EMCal depth seen by the particle will depend on rapidity (with 45 degrees to the beam line it will be a factor of sqrt(2) larger compared to 0 degree). We know that e/h separation will be affected (shower profile), but simple E/p matching performance for eID may be affected too (deeper EMCal - more probability for charged hadron to shower); also the affect of gaps will be different with the angle.
- Comparison of simulation with test beam data (electrons, pions, etc) and find the ways for simulation tuning (e.g. light transport model and/or non-uniformity map, etc.) - contacts: Petr,
- Detector Design Optimization (contact: Cristiano)
- ...