Difference between revisions of "EEEMCal Beam Tests"
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Back to [https://wiki.jlab.org/cuawiki/index.php/Electron-Ion_Collider_Detectors:_EEEMCal EEEMCAL Main Page] | Back to [https://wiki.jlab.org/cuawiki/index.php/Electron-Ion_Collider_Detectors:_EEEMCal EEEMCAL Main Page] | ||
| − | The EEEMCal group is has been carrying out detector prototype beam tests at Jefferson Lab and DESY. The next beam tests are planned for 2024 | + | The EEEMCal group is has been carrying out detector prototype beam tests at Jefferson Lab and DESY. The next beam tests are planned for 2024 |
For information on beam tests at Jefferson Lab (contact: [mailto:hornt@cua.edu Tanja Horn]). For beam tests at DESY (contact: [mailto:hasell@mit.edu Douglas Hasell]) | For information on beam tests at Jefferson Lab (contact: [mailto:hornt@cua.edu Tanja Horn]). For beam tests at DESY (contact: [mailto:hasell@mit.edu Douglas Hasell]) | ||
| + | |||
| + | = [[EEEMCAL BEAM TESTS 2024]] = | ||
| + | |||
| + | Beam test campaigns planned with focus on 1) 5x5 PWO+SiPM full chain test, 2) 5x5 with realistic mechanical structures, e.g., carbon. For (1), the electronics/readout overall need to complete investigations of stability, linearity, and power deposition for the two approaches (discrete and ASICS). Beam test goals: | ||
| + | ::* test if ASIC gives comparable result with fADC | ||
| + | ::* what is the minimum energy that can be detected with both sets of electronics | ||
| + | ::* SiPM choice should be made before beam tests with only one channel. Idea is to use only one type of SiPM for the beam test. This can be done with cosmics. For SiPM need to decide between 10um and 15um - one of the differences is nonlinearity | ||
= [[EEEMCAL BEAM TESTS 2022 and 2023]] = | = [[EEEMCAL BEAM TESTS 2022 and 2023]] = | ||
| − | Beam test campaigns carried out with 3x3 PWO (JLab, also MAMI) and 5x5 PWO (DESY) arrays. | + | Beam test campaigns carried out with 3x3 PWO+SiPM (JLab, also MAMI) and 5x5 PWO+PMT (DESY) arrays. |
= [[EEEMCAL BEAM TESTS 2021]] = | = [[EEEMCAL BEAM TESTS 2021]] = | ||
| + | |||
| + | Beam test campaigns carried out with 3x3 PWO+PMT (JLab) | ||
= [[SciGlass prototype 2022]] = | = [[SciGlass prototype 2022]] = | ||
Detailed descriptions of the SciGlass prototype beam tests in 2022 and 2023. (contact: [mailto:yeran@jlab.org Yeran Ghandilyan] for site content) | Detailed descriptions of the SciGlass prototype beam tests in 2022 and 2023. (contact: [mailto:yeran@jlab.org Yeran Ghandilyan] for site content) | ||
Latest revision as of 15:30, 5 April 2024
Back to EEEMCAL Main Page
The EEEMCal group is has been carrying out detector prototype beam tests at Jefferson Lab and DESY. The next beam tests are planned for 2024
For information on beam tests at Jefferson Lab (contact: Tanja Horn). For beam tests at DESY (contact: Douglas Hasell)
EEEMCAL BEAM TESTS 2024
Beam test campaigns planned with focus on 1) 5x5 PWO+SiPM full chain test, 2) 5x5 with realistic mechanical structures, e.g., carbon. For (1), the electronics/readout overall need to complete investigations of stability, linearity, and power deposition for the two approaches (discrete and ASICS). Beam test goals:
- test if ASIC gives comparable result with fADC
- what is the minimum energy that can be detected with both sets of electronics
- SiPM choice should be made before beam tests with only one channel. Idea is to use only one type of SiPM for the beam test. This can be done with cosmics. For SiPM need to decide between 10um and 15um - one of the differences is nonlinearity
EEEMCAL BEAM TESTS 2022 and 2023
Beam test campaigns carried out with 3x3 PWO+SiPM (JLab, also MAMI) and 5x5 PWO+PMT (DESY) arrays.
EEEMCAL BEAM TESTS 2021
Beam test campaigns carried out with 3x3 PWO+PMT (JLab)
SciGlass prototype 2022
Detailed descriptions of the SciGlass prototype beam tests in 2022 and 2023. (contact: Yeran Ghandilyan for site content)