Difference between revisions of "Meeting 20 April 2017"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "PRESENTATIONS FROM THE MEETING * [https://wiki.jlab.org/cuawiki/images/a/a4/ToyCPS_1.pdf DINREG/GEANT3 simulation (Pavel)] * [https://wiki.jlab.org/cuawiki/images/7/7d/CPS.p...") |
|||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
* [https://wiki.jlab.org/cuawiki/images/0/0c/GN_HCPS_4_20_2017.pdf GEANT4 simulation (Gabi)] | * [https://wiki.jlab.org/cuawiki/images/0/0c/GN_HCPS_4_20_2017.pdf GEANT4 simulation (Gabi)] | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | HOMEWORK FROM THE MEETING (from Thia's 4/21/17 email) | ||
+ | |||
+ | * We agreed that the two WACS-focused groups would send suggested toy models of their systems that they would like to work on before the next meeting to Rolf, Tanja, and I for comment. This should be done in the next couple days so that we can iterate this back out quickly. All will work with a 10% radiator, 2.5 uAmps, 11.5 GeV beam for now. | ||
+ | |||
+ | * In parallel, we all agreed that actual experiment benchmarking of the results, in particular the "interesting" differences we observed between codes, was important work to pursue. | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Also, it seemed clear that the Hall D K_long effort was positively on track with what we did already - perhaps move to a rectangular toy model of the same thing with a beam aperture is all that's needed as a next step here. |
Revision as of 17:40, 21 April 2017
PRESENTATIONS FROM THE MEETING
HOMEWORK FROM THE MEETING (from Thia's 4/21/17 email)
- We agreed that the two WACS-focused groups would send suggested toy models of their systems that they would like to work on before the next meeting to Rolf, Tanja, and I for comment. This should be done in the next couple days so that we can iterate this back out quickly. All will work with a 10% radiator, 2.5 uAmps, 11.5 GeV beam for now.
- In parallel, we all agreed that actual experiment benchmarking of the results, in particular the "interesting" differences we observed between codes, was important work to pursue.
- Also, it seemed clear that the Hall D K_long effort was positively on track with what we did already - perhaps move to a rectangular toy model of the same thing with a beam aperture is all that's needed as a next step here.