Difference between revisions of "Meeting 20 April 2017"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | PRESENTATIONS | + | '''PRESENTATIONS''' |
* [https://wiki.jlab.org/cuawiki/images/a/a4/ToyCPS_1.pdf DINREG/GEANT3 simulation (Pavel)] | * [https://wiki.jlab.org/cuawiki/images/a/a4/ToyCPS_1.pdf DINREG/GEANT3 simulation (Pavel)] | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
| − | HOMEWORK | + | '''NOTES''' |
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | '''HOMEWORK (from Thia's 4/21/17 email)''' | ||
* We agreed that the two WACS-focused groups would send suggested toy models of their systems that they would like to work on before the next meeting to Rolf, Tanja, and I for comment. This should be done in the next couple days so that we can iterate this back out quickly. All will work with a 10% radiator, 2.5 uAmps, 11.5 GeV beam for now. | * We agreed that the two WACS-focused groups would send suggested toy models of their systems that they would like to work on before the next meeting to Rolf, Tanja, and I for comment. This should be done in the next couple days so that we can iterate this back out quickly. All will work with a 10% radiator, 2.5 uAmps, 11.5 GeV beam for now. | ||
Revision as of 17:40, 21 April 2017
PRESENTATIONS
NOTES
HOMEWORK (from Thia's 4/21/17 email)
- We agreed that the two WACS-focused groups would send suggested toy models of their systems that they would like to work on before the next meeting to Rolf, Tanja, and I for comment. This should be done in the next couple days so that we can iterate this back out quickly. All will work with a 10% radiator, 2.5 uAmps, 11.5 GeV beam for now.
- In parallel, we all agreed that actual experiment benchmarking of the results, in particular the "interesting" differences we observed between codes, was important work to pursue.
- Also, it seemed clear that the Hall D K_long effort was positively on track with what we did already - perhaps move to a rectangular toy model of the same thing with a beam aperture is all that's needed as a next step here.