Difference between revisions of "General Meeting Summary 5/17/18"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "DISCUSSION TCS PAC46 DRAFT * Overall looks good, physics motivation good, but work remains to be done to include, e.g.: ::* Executive summary (1-4 pages) with plot(s) that sh...") |
|||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
::* Design of proton recoil detector | ::* Design of proton recoil detector | ||
::* Final trigger rates - high rates may be addressed with adjusting segmentation | ::* Final trigger rates - high rates may be addressed with adjusting segmentation | ||
− | |||
* Discussion about including neutron data | * Discussion about including neutron data | ||
::* targets in principle feasible | ::* targets in principle feasible | ||
::* dealing with exclusivity more difficult | ::* dealing with exclusivity more difficult | ||
− | |||
* Discussion and recommendations for proceeding with full proposal vs. LOI at PAC46 | * Discussion and recommendations for proceeding with full proposal vs. LOI at PAC46 | ||
Line 30: | Line 28: | ||
::* Chris Stanislav tested four of them and found them to be passing specs | ::* Chris Stanislav tested four of them and found them to be passing specs | ||
::* Remaining 1170 ones will be ordered shortly | ::* Remaining 1170 ones will be ordered shortly | ||
+ | |||
* Magnet assembly schedule - to be discussed in next meeting | * Magnet assembly schedule - to be discussed in next meeting | ||
+ | |||
* Update on crystals in next meeting | * Update on crystals in next meeting | ||
+ | |||
* Update on 10x10 prototype (ComCal) design/assembly postponed to next meeting | * Update on 10x10 prototype (ComCal) design/assembly postponed to next meeting | ||
+ | |||
NEXT MEETING: THURSDAY 31 MAY AT 9:00 AM (EDT) | NEXT MEETING: THURSDAY 31 MAY AT 9:00 AM (EDT) |
Latest revision as of 13:11, 18 May 2018
DISCUSSION TCS PAC46 DRAFT
- Overall looks good, physics motivation good, but work remains to be done to include, e.g.:
- Executive summary (1-4 pages) with plot(s) that show the power of the measurement - Fig. 12 and Fig. 38 seem best
- Strengthen motivation for universality and quantify
- check and fix inconsistencies of Fig. 34ff, e.g. t<0.2 not possible, correct calculation of luminosity, NPS description update
- update projections with experimental acceptance, CPS, target, etc.
- Discussion about measurement of observables with sufficient precision to show consistent framework exists vs. measuring directly universality
- Technical questions
- Design of proton recoil detector
- Final trigger rates - high rates may be addressed with adjusting segmentation
- Discussion about including neutron data
- targets in principle feasible
- dealing with exclusivity more difficult
- Discussion and recommendations for proceeding with full proposal vs. LOI at PAC46
- Physics case nice, good precision experiment, however, much work still to be done in limited time
- An LOI could be very strong, requires updates, but not as much as full proposal would
- Likely outcomes for full proposal limited to: conditional approval pending CPS review, deferral
NPS SUBSYSTEMS
- HV bases (update from Julie)
- Magnet assembly schedule - to be discussed in next meeting
- Update on crystals in next meeting
- Update on 10x10 prototype (ComCal) design/assembly postponed to next meeting
NEXT MEETING: THURSDAY 31 MAY AT 9:00 AM (EDT)