Difference between revisions of "Meeting 15 November 2019"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
* [https://wiki.jlab.org/cuawiki/images/e/e1/CPS_article_rev2.6.pdf CPS Article (almost final?) draft] | * [https://wiki.jlab.org/cuawiki/images/e/e1/CPS_article_rev2.6.pdf CPS Article (almost final?) draft] | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ACTION ITEMS | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Dose rate at magnet coils - figure out why the dose rate appears to be higher than in earlier simulations | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Article draft - send funding support information to David H, implement additional comments from Bogdan | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Further develop CPS budget for proposal | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Make rough draft for CPS collaboration meeting agenda | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | DISCUSSION SUMMARY | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Discussion of simulations and prompt coil dose rate | ||
| + | ::* Dose rate seems a factor of 50 higher than in earlier calculations | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | * Discussion about additional comments on the article draft | ||
| + | ::* comments from Sean and Donal have been implemented, also a new figure from Gabriel | ||
| + | ::* last few sections were re-written | ||
| + | ::* Bogdan has additional comments that he will give by email | ||
| + | ::* include funding support in acknowledgements | ||
| + | ::* need to include the magnet coil dose rate | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | * Discussion about funding proposal | ||
| + | ::* For Phase I a 30 ton shielding may be sufficient | ||
| + | ::* Magnet coil cost will depend on final dose rate projection | ||
| + | ::* Project defined so that all parts work and detector validated | ||
| + | ::* Cost share requirement for all institutions that are not undergrad serving | ||
| + | ::* U. Glasgow contribution | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | * CPS Collaboration Meeting - TUESDAY 4 February 2020 at JLab | ||
| + | ::* Possible agenda items: | ||
| + | ::::* simulations | ||
| + | ::::* design | ||
| + | ::::* real changes from Hall A/C to Hall D design | ||
| + | ::::* physics (c.f. PAC comments) | ||
| + | ::* Make agenda draft for next meeting | ||
Latest revision as of 16:20, 15 November 2019
DISCUSSION MATERIAL
ACTION ITEMS
- Dose rate at magnet coils - figure out why the dose rate appears to be higher than in earlier simulations
- Article draft - send funding support information to David H, implement additional comments from Bogdan
- Further develop CPS budget for proposal
- Make rough draft for CPS collaboration meeting agenda
DISCUSSION SUMMARY
- Discussion of simulations and prompt coil dose rate
- Dose rate seems a factor of 50 higher than in earlier calculations
- Discussion about additional comments on the article draft
- comments from Sean and Donal have been implemented, also a new figure from Gabriel
- last few sections were re-written
- Bogdan has additional comments that he will give by email
- include funding support in acknowledgements
- need to include the magnet coil dose rate
- Discussion about funding proposal
- For Phase I a 30 ton shielding may be sufficient
- Magnet coil cost will depend on final dose rate projection
- Project defined so that all parts work and detector validated
- Cost share requirement for all institutions that are not undergrad serving
- U. Glasgow contribution
- CPS Collaboration Meeting - TUESDAY 4 February 2020 at JLab
- Possible agenda items:
- simulations
- design
- real changes from Hall A/C to Hall D design
- physics (c.f. PAC comments)
- Make agenda draft for next meeting