Difference between revisions of "General Meeting Agenda 3/14/13"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Slides discussed during the meeting: | Slides discussed during the meeting: | ||
| − | [http://www.vsl.cua.edu/cua_phy/images/ | + | [http://www.vsl.cua.edu/cua_phy/images/e/ec/Bgr_sweep_e100_g3.pdf Background rates with 3 MeV photon cut] |
| − | [http://www.vsl.cua.edu/cua_phy/images/ | + | [http://www.vsl.cua.edu/cua_phy/images/a/ae/Bgr_sweep_e100_g10.pdf Background rates with 10 MeV photon cut] |
| − | [http://www.vsl.cua.edu/cua_phy/images/ | + | [http://www.vsl.cua.edu/cua_phy/images/2/26/Photon_rates.pdf Photon rates with various cuts] |
| − | [http://www.vsl.cua.edu/cua_phy/images/ | + | [http://www.vsl.cua.edu/cua_phy/images/c/c5/Camsonne-p82.pdf Example of effect of beam pipe enlargement on background rates] |
[http://www.vsl.cua.edu/cua_phy/images/6/60/Wacs_writeup1.pdf Simon's report on WACS simulations] | [http://www.vsl.cua.edu/cua_phy/images/6/60/Wacs_writeup1.pdf Simon's report on WACS simulations] | ||
Latest revision as of 09:02, 22 March 2013
The main topics discussed at this meeting were:
- Follow-up on the items from the last meeting (background studies and kinematics - see list below)
- Report from Simon Sirca on WACS simulations
Slides discussed during the meeting:
Background rates with 3 MeV photon cut
Background rates with 10 MeV photon cut
Photon rates with various cuts
Example of effect of beam pipe enlargement on background rates
Simon's report on WACS simulations
Items from last time
- What is the desired optimal distance from target for the detector front face for forward angles. This info is prerequisite for background studies, e.g., beam pipe.
- Figure: background per block as function of angle for 1uA beam current and 10cm target (similar to figure of dose rate as function of angle)
- Background estimates at smallest angle and at 11 GeV (and bigger beam pipe)
- Summary of details on geometry information needed for WACS (e.g. resolution), DVCS (e.g., scattering chamber dimensions, beam pipe dimensions, etc.), and perhaps others(?)
- How much of DVCS projected beam time can be shared with pi0 DES and SIDIS (including both Hall A and C kinematics)