Difference between revisions of "General Meeting Agenda 3/27/14"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
Quick look at effect of 4 ns jitter and 250 MHz on pulse shape, it does not fluctuate as bad as I thought so trigger should work. To be tested with real hardware. | Quick look at effect of 4 ns jitter and 250 MHz on pulse shape, it does not fluctuate as bad as I thought so trigger should work. To be tested with real hardware. | ||
| − | [[ | + | [[https://userweb.jlab.org/~camsonne/downsample.gif resumming of 1 GHz to 250 MHz]] |
Carlos is looking at elastic data to determine effect of lower sampling rate on energy resolution and timing, will show results maybe at next meeting. | Carlos is looking at elastic data to determine effect of lower sampling rate on energy resolution and timing, will show results maybe at next meeting. | ||
Revision as of 09:07, 27 March 2014
ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION:
- NPS DESIGN and PROTOTYPE TEST STATUS (Hamlet)
- NPS ELECTRONICS TESTS (Alexandre)
Got the FADC trigger board this week. Have one FADC and VXS crate in test lab. Can start setting up. Need to follow up with Alexander Somov for borrowing a CTP.
Quick look at effect of 4 ns jitter and 250 MHz on pulse shape, it does not fluctuate as bad as I thought so trigger should work. To be tested with real hardware.
[resumming of 1 GHz to 250 MHz]
Carlos is looking at elastic data to determine effect of lower sampling rate on energy resolution and timing, will show results maybe at next meeting.