General EEEMCal Meeting Summary 1/14/22

From Cuawiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

PARTICIPANTS: Sasha, Vladimir, Carlos, Douglas, Hamlet, Hrachya, Olivier, Renee, Vardan, Vladimir, Tanja


SCIGLASS VS PBGLASS

  • Using PbGl from Phenix - what would happen if use longer modules?
  • At best would not make things better
  • longer modules, longer interaction length for hadrons - higher prob to interact and to look similar to electron, so no better e/pi
  • longer modules better for high energy, but not better for lower energy - lead glass will have light attenuation
  • Beam test: lead glass with definite length and found 40cm
  • light attentuation also present in SciGlass
  • Lead glass only Cherenkov, SciGlass scintillator and has more photons and attenuation not as much of an impact
  • Best type of PbGl for EIC - PbGl can handle about 10kRad - TF1 type best to use (those are the ones that are available from JLab with similar dimensions of SciGlass)
  • PbGl straightforward to cut


MECHANICAL DESIGN MODEL

  • Need definition of geometry
  • Try to get to higher eta coverage with insert
  • Action: find out about insert in global context


READOUT

  • Array of SiPMs - options availabe from vendor and iterate
  • Readout array design for collecting light from large surface - how many SiPMs, light guides
  • Prototype tests: Crytur-USA, JLAB
  • Testbench: linearity, pixel recovery time, jitters, (methods established by GlueX)
  • Need to present concrete plans by spring 2023
  • How to read out from 4x4cm^2 - tests are needed for that
  • Project: find out what Hamamatsu SiPM cost, Hamamatsu can produce 4x4 matrix (Fernando)
  • Orsay: possibility for reading SiPM with ASIC (existing)
  • What dont't have yet: photon density (photons from crystal per MeV) for SiPM - for this need calibration spectrum for SiPM (two steps: measure crystal with beam, then calibrate - same tower with LED and increase gain etc.)
  • alternative: test with scintillator with radioactive source
  • Electron side in EIC need to measure to very low energies - need to understand/reduce noise
  • Prototype tests could be done at AANL 1-10 MeV - need to schedule several months in advance


SIMULATIONS AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT

  • UK planning to develop software
  • Need information on software framework
  • AI WG - optimization of EEEMCAL with AI assistance
  • Clustering and shower profile evaluation - discrimination of single photons and merged pi0 photons up to highest momentum
  • merged photons from pi0 decay
  • large modules becomes even more important


PROTOTYPES

  • SciGlass should be at MIT by end of March for DESY beam tests
  • nine would be ideal
  • Low energy tests at AANL - need prototype


SUMMARY SLIDES FROM JLAB PROTOTYPE TESTS

  • Crystal
  • SiPM
  • SciGlass


NEXT MEETING: 4 FEBRUARY AT 8AM ET