Difference between revisions of "General EEEMCal Meeting Summary 6/16/23"

From Cuawiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "Participants: Cristiano, Sasha, Carlos, Larry, Carlos Y., Tanja, Hamlet, Julien, Renee, Hrachya, Julie, Artur, Rosi, Joerg, Olivier (Crytur-USA), Ioana, Vardan, Yeran, Dmitry...")
 
Line 2: Line 2:
  
  
SIPM SPECS DISCUSSION
+
SIPM SPECS DISCUSSION (All)
  
* EIC Project requests SiPM specs table for EEEMCAL
+
* EIC Project requests SiPM specs table for EEEMCAL: [https://brookhavenlab.sharepoint.com/:x:/s/EICPublicSharingDocs/EQQCeLzF9ZJHqoeKsSsp29cBwyoFKEnDMcghuQJnfep-NQ?e=LGpvDX Official spreadsheet at this link]
  
* Voltage is important if light is not mixed up well - for crystals the light is
+
* Voltage is important if light is not mixed up well - for crystals the light is mixed well and uniform and not much sensitivity is expected
 +
 
 +
* Variation of operating voltage of tray
 +
::* Current design has an array of 3x3 or 4x4 SiPMs in a matrix with one output per matrix
 +
::* May need to comment on sensitivity to gain variations between individual SiPMs - check JLab studies
 +
 
 +
* When listing specs keep in mind the variations - tolerances
 +
::* Efficiency cannot be changed by changing operating voltage
 +
 
 +
* SiPM review is expected for July 2023
  
 
* Action Item: collect all documentation on tests carried out at IJCLab-Orsay and JLab and check table entries
 
* Action Item: collect all documentation on tests carried out at IJCLab-Orsay and JLab and check table entries
 +
 +
 +
ENGINEERING UPDATES (Julien)
 +
 +
* One of main focus areas is clearances with other infrastructure, e.g., the beam pipe and the DIRC frame - discussions are ongoing between EEEMCAL representatives (Julien, Jim, Josh) and the EIC Project technical team
 +
 +
* One the integration/installation side of the EEEMCAL into the DIRC frame the rails option is being studied in details
 +
::* assembly depends on positioning of the rails
 +
 +
* Overall, need assembly space at BNL for the EEEMCAL
 +
 +
* Discussion about space for cables and stress on cables in the assembly
 +
::* general idea is to use stretchers, but more studies are planned
 +
 +
 +
EEEMCAL ORGANIZATION (Tanja, Carlos)

Revision as of 17:55, 16 June 2023

Participants: Cristiano, Sasha, Carlos, Larry, Carlos Y., Tanja, Hamlet, Julien, Renee, Hrachya, Julie, Artur, Rosi, Joerg, Olivier (Crytur-USA), Ioana, Vardan, Yeran, Dmitry


SIPM SPECS DISCUSSION (All)

  • Voltage is important if light is not mixed up well - for crystals the light is mixed well and uniform and not much sensitivity is expected
  • Variation of operating voltage of tray
  • Current design has an array of 3x3 or 4x4 SiPMs in a matrix with one output per matrix
  • May need to comment on sensitivity to gain variations between individual SiPMs - check JLab studies
  • When listing specs keep in mind the variations - tolerances
  • Efficiency cannot be changed by changing operating voltage
  • SiPM review is expected for July 2023
  • Action Item: collect all documentation on tests carried out at IJCLab-Orsay and JLab and check table entries


ENGINEERING UPDATES (Julien)

  • One of main focus areas is clearances with other infrastructure, e.g., the beam pipe and the DIRC frame - discussions are ongoing between EEEMCAL representatives (Julien, Jim, Josh) and the EIC Project technical team
  • One the integration/installation side of the EEEMCAL into the DIRC frame the rails option is being studied in details
  • assembly depends on positioning of the rails
  • Overall, need assembly space at BNL for the EEEMCAL
  • Discussion about space for cables and stress on cables in the assembly
  • general idea is to use stretchers, but more studies are planned


EEEMCAL ORGANIZATION (Tanja, Carlos)