General Meeting Summary 2/18/16

From Cuawiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

NPS MAGNET UPDATE

  • Discussion about yoke
  • Designer verified that amount of steel from the pole tip of BNL's Multiparticle Spectrometer is sufficient for the entire NPS magnet including the extra steel required for WACS experiments
  • Steel arrived at JLab and is stored in the test lab
  • Estimated time until start of construction is ~4 months
  • Action item: still need full magnet model - requires support from designer
  • Discussion about conductor and coil
  • Conductor and suitable power supply (HKS) have been identified, so could start production of coil relatively soon - requires support from designer
  • field in gap is good - 5 kG as required, no saturation
  • Discussion about fringe fields
  • an alternative coil design could reduce fringe fields by factor 4 and also optimize the geometry from the design point of view
  • the alternative coil design would use the same conductor, but would go effectively twice around
  • Action item: ask for quotation for both coil designs
  • Action item: check on other power supplies, e.g., SOS power supply - how close are the parameters?


NPS BACKGROUND STUDIES

  • Discussion about the NPS GEANT4 simulation
  • Action item: make a comparative study with magnet in vertical and horizontal field configuration and check if there any high dose rates in crystals in the horizontal case
  • should change to hydrogen/deuterium target in simulation - assume 10 cm long targets
  • do not apply any thresholds in this study


COMPACT PHOTON SOURCE

  • Discussion about dump design and radiation control issues, which are a major factor in the design. An important aspect to move forward is to resolve technical issues, e.g.,
  • materials needed to construct the dump
  • starting from, e.g., the Hall D dump, how could one construct a more compact one that is also servicable
  • Discussion about a workshop on the use of an intense photon source and polarized targets
  • best time for this seems to be on the scale of 6-9 months - could be adjacent to the next NPS collaboration meeting
  • Presentation and discussion about improvement of figure of merit of approved WACS experiment with compact photon source
  • taking into account all aspects the improvement is a factor of ~17
  • Discussion about impact of heat load in depolarization - how does rotation affect space needed and amount of target material


ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING:

  • Coil quotations (Bogdan)
  • Comparative background study (Vardan)
  • Other...


NEXT MEETING: THUR 10 MARCH, TIME: 9:00 AM (EST)