General Meson SF Meeting Summary 11/5/21

From Cuawiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

PARTICIPANTS: Bill, Patrick, Richard, Stephen, Tanja, Rolf, Tobias, John, Huey-Wen

EIC IMPACT STUDIES (Patrick)

  • re-performed fits cutting out high xL values
  • results seem to suggest a large impact - larger than expected based on previous results in paper
  • currently using un-correlated uncertainties - may be driving since losing the uncertainty due to having different data sets
  • problem with global fits in region with no data
  • if only point-to-point
  • move within 1 sigma but have many points from same data set --> goes to one line/value driven by this, c.f., CLAS data
  • normally have more than one data set that also includes a scale uncertainty
  • Action items:
  • make a small point-to-point, e.g., 0.1-0.2% (luminosity) and rest normalization (~1%)
  • reduce number of data points - improvement of TMDs/kT etc.
  • small documentation of what's different from the YR, e.g., figures with captions


FAR FORWARD DETECTORS OCCUPANCIES (Richard, Bill)

  • After fixed generator and EIC-smear (discrepancy between the two - may be related to calculation of momentum) and with B0 included
  • 5 on 100 and 10 on 100 show same occupancy at ZDC
  • For 5 on 41 losing acceptance ~59% detection efficiency
  • optics different from YR where had no B0 - now have more hits in B0 and losing events
  • Consider event generator to be validated and final - postpone any additional tweaking until later
  • Calculate t distribution in the Fun4All framework
  • Input to EIC Impact Studies: Q2, x, xL, y, number of events (100 fb^-1)
  • number of events currently determined by ZDC
  • if include t-dependence then need RP and OMD
  • Note on Kaons: Fun4all does not decay Lambda correctly - branching ratio wrong
  • decay length - energy different
  • not due to obstruction in beam pipe
  • Action items:
  • Occupancies for IP6 to compare with geometric acceptances in YR
  • Occupancies for IP8 can be done to check geometric acceptances of IP6 vs. IP8
  • t-resolution in fun4all framework to check impact on t for IP6 vs IP8 on FF and SF
  • reconstruction of kinematic variables
  • Kaons - will still pursue, but may not be part of the proposals
  • check with Dmitry and Yulia about kaon decay modules used during YR


NEXT MEETING: THURSDAY 11 NOVEMBER AT 5:00PM ET