Difference between revisions of "Meeting 13 February 2018"

From Cuawiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "'''PRESENTATIONS''' [ FLUKA Simulations for absolute baseline (Parker Reid)] '''NOTES'''")
 
Line 5: Line 5:
  
 
'''NOTES'''
 
'''NOTES'''
 +
 +
* Discussion of Parker's simulation
 +
::* In principle can use this way to determine backward shielding needs and perform overall shielding optimization: remove everything, but keep radiator, no field, so exactly what would have in hall - compare backward rate for 100uA on 2% carbon to CPS
 +
 +
 +
* Discussion of what information still needed for review document
 +
::* Effect of both polarized target and CPS in Hall - Jixie's simulation has shown radiation from polarized target and CPS separately and these look ok, now need to see both together
 +
::* Backward shielding
 +
::* Optimization of shielding: why choice of specific shielding and what thickness
 +
 +
 +
* Discussion about contents of the review document
 +
::* Selection of figures and text that demonstrate: 1) radiation acceptable 2) design feasible
 +
 +
 +
* Discussion about an alternative polarized target moving concept that moves the beam (horizontally) instead of a mechanical structure (target stick vertical motion)
 +
 +
 +
* Action items for next meeting on Tuesday, 13 March at 3:00pm (EST):
 +
::* Result for backward shielding and optimization of shielding overall
 +
::* Result for effect of polarized target and CPS together
 +
::* Outline for a 10-page document (topics/chapters/arguments to make and type of figures) and for a 1-page appendix (what would change in Hall D, e.g. floor loading etc., demonstration that the concept is doable)

Revision as of 00:44, 14 February 2018

PRESENTATIONS

[ FLUKA Simulations for absolute baseline (Parker Reid)]


NOTES

  • Discussion of Parker's simulation
  • In principle can use this way to determine backward shielding needs and perform overall shielding optimization: remove everything, but keep radiator, no field, so exactly what would have in hall - compare backward rate for 100uA on 2% carbon to CPS


  • Discussion of what information still needed for review document
  • Effect of both polarized target and CPS in Hall - Jixie's simulation has shown radiation from polarized target and CPS separately and these look ok, now need to see both together
  • Backward shielding
  • Optimization of shielding: why choice of specific shielding and what thickness


  • Discussion about contents of the review document
  • Selection of figures and text that demonstrate: 1) radiation acceptable 2) design feasible


  • Discussion about an alternative polarized target moving concept that moves the beam (horizontally) instead of a mechanical structure (target stick vertical motion)


  • Action items for next meeting on Tuesday, 13 March at 3:00pm (EST):
  • Result for backward shielding and optimization of shielding overall
  • Result for effect of polarized target and CPS together
  • Outline for a 10-page document (topics/chapters/arguments to make and type of figures) and for a 1-page appendix (what would change in Hall D, e.g. floor loading etc., demonstration that the concept is doable)