Difference between revisions of "Meeting 16 October 2018"

From Cuawiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "CPS DOCUMENT ACTION ITEMS * Determine achievable accuracy of polarization - estimate of relative uncertainty of target polarization, e.g. due to radiation damage caused by el...")
 
 
Line 1: Line 1:
CPS DOCUMENT ACTION ITEMS
+
'''CPS DOCUMENT ACTION ITEMS
 
+
'''
 
* Determine achievable accuracy of polarization - estimate of relative uncertainty of target polarization, e.g. due to radiation damage caused by electron-positron pair production (Jixie/Dustin/Donal)
 
* Determine achievable accuracy of polarization - estimate of relative uncertainty of target polarization, e.g. due to radiation damage caused by electron-positron pair production (Jixie/Dustin/Donal)
  
Line 12: Line 12:
  
  
SUMMARY OF THE DISCUSSION
+
'''SUMMARY OF THE DISCUSSION'''
  
 
CPS DOCUMENT
 
CPS DOCUMENT

Latest revision as of 16:43, 16 October 2018

CPS DOCUMENT ACTION ITEMS

  • Determine achievable accuracy of polarization - estimate of relative uncertainty of target polarization, e.g. due to radiation damage caused by electron-positron pair production (Jixie/Dustin/Donal)
  • Write up field quality of polarized target (Bogdan)
  • Add phrasing or rephrase activation dose at one foot from the scattering chamber after ~100 hour run (Tanja/Rolf)
  • Overall editing to address report comment that narrative doesn't flow smoothly and errors in the figure captions (David H.)
  • Discussion of preliminary tuning of shielding (Bogdan/Rolf)


SUMMARY OF THE DISCUSSION

CPS DOCUMENT

  • Discussion about updating document following the guidance in the report from JLab - see action items above
  • further detail on report final remark on narrative not flowing smoothly: check for 1) concatenated sections in which sentences may not follow logically and require knowledge of subsequent pages, 2) magnet figure - component not described, 3) figures with the same captions
  • Aim is to finalize all updates by 21 December


POSSIBLE PUBLICATION IN NIM OR SIMILAR

  • General consensus is that it is a good idea - also a way to show new capabilities at JLab to people who may not yet be aware
  • Aiming for instrumentation paper, so not all pieces of current technical document, e.g. regarding the science, may be needed
  • Aim for putting together an initial draft by 2019 Hall A/C Winter meeting and solicit feedback


CPS CONSTRUCTION

  • Collaborators from universities will try to get guidance from NSF


NEXT MEETING: TUESDAY 4 DECEMBER AT 3PM (EST)